Dear statalist users,
I am using xtabond2 in Stata 13.1 to estimate the effects of police inspections on the crime rate, considered as endogenous. The other regressors are considered predetermined. However, I have a doubt about how to properly specify L(0/1).inspections in the instrument set.
Here is the code:
xtabond2 crime L.crime L(0/1).(inspections) assoc_rate Education lgdp unem den y2009-y2016, ///
gmmstyle(crime inspections, collapse laglimits(2 4) eq(diff)) ///
gmmstyle(assoc_rate Education lgdp unem den, collapse lag(1 3) eq(diff)) ///
ivstyle(LD.(crime inspections), eq(level) mz) ///
ivstyle(D.assoc_rate D.Education D.lgdp D.unem D.den, eq(level) mz) ///
ivstyle(y2009-y2016, eq(level) mz) ///
robust small artests(3)
Is it the correct specification for the endogenous regressors or should I specify it as:
gmmstyle(crime inspections L.inspections, collapse laglimits(2 4) eq(diff)) ///
ivstyle(LD.(crime inspections L.inspections), eq(level) mz) ///
?
Related Posts with System-gmm xtabond2 - Correct specifications of additional lags of a regressor in the instrument set?
drop all zero variablesHello, I have created dummy variables for industries, resulting in 35 dummies. However, I deleteted…
Spell-type data for Cox regressionHello, dear users of the Stata program. Now I'm conducting a reserach on duration of unemployment. I…
Merging dataHello, I am trying to merge variables from the original Demographic and Health surveys (DHS) with t…
Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition for probit modelHello, I have assessed online materials available for the decomposition of both linear and non-line…
Replacing missing values in a panel dataDear All, hope you are all safe and in good health. Kindly I have balanced panel data with missing…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to System-gmm xtabond2 - Correct specifications of additional lags of a regressor in the instrument set?
Post a Comment