Dear statalist users,
I am using xtabond2 in Stata 13.1 to estimate the effects of police inspections on the crime rate, considered as endogenous. The other regressors are considered predetermined. However, I have a doubt about how to properly specify L(0/1).inspections in the instrument set.
Here is the code:
xtabond2 crime L.crime L(0/1).(inspections) assoc_rate Education lgdp unem den y2009-y2016, ///
gmmstyle(crime inspections, collapse laglimits(2 4) eq(diff)) ///
gmmstyle(assoc_rate Education lgdp unem den, collapse lag(1 3) eq(diff)) ///
ivstyle(LD.(crime inspections), eq(level) mz) ///
ivstyle(D.assoc_rate D.Education D.lgdp D.unem D.den, eq(level) mz) ///
ivstyle(y2009-y2016, eq(level) mz) ///
robust small artests(3)
Is it the correct specification for the endogenous regressors or should I specify it as:
gmmstyle(crime inspections L.inspections, collapse laglimits(2 4) eq(diff)) ///
ivstyle(LD.(crime inspections L.inspections), eq(level) mz) ///
?
Related Posts with System-gmm xtabond2 - Correct specifications of additional lags of a regressor in the instrument set?
Problem with Fairlie Decomposition TechniqueHello, I have used "Fairlie decomposition technique" to decompose a binary model. However, the resul…
blau indexDear all, Can anyone assist me on how to calculate nationality diversity on stata? I am working on d…
add 0 trade datadear all, I have 100 countries import and 100 countries export country panel data I hope to add al…
margins, after heckmandeal all, I regress using heckman model for panel data. I tried post heckman marginal effect comman…
Two-step model and inclusion of variablesHi, I am trying to perform a two-step model to account for selection bias. My question relates to h…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to System-gmm xtabond2 - Correct specifications of additional lags of a regressor in the instrument set?
Post a Comment