Dear Statalisters,
When running a GMM in a 2-step procedure we use the optimal weighting matrix to weight the moments and better the assymptotic variance of the gmm estimator. The weighting matrix must be inverted and its rank is equal to the number of groups N, so because of that the number of instruments (moments) must be less than N, otherwise the matrix cannot be inverted.
The problem is: Even reducing the number of instruments making them less than N, the command xtabond2 continues to informe that the weighting matrix is singular. Why this occur? Is it a problem with the command or what?
Please if someone can help me I will really appreciate. I searched hardly something that could clarify this point for me but I found nothing.
Related Posts with Singular weighting matrix in 2-step GMM with xtabond2
Using analytical weight in STATA's mixed effects modelI have a learning assessment dataset of over 60 countries and 2-5 years/waves. While countries are t…
The Hausman test for endogeneityI have read in a paper that we can use Hausman test for endogeneity. and the authors mentioned that …
Finding Most Common String Values Across VariablesHi all: I am trying to find the most common string values across variables. While I work in crimina…
Interpretation of sdtestHi everyone, I am using the sdtest command to evaluate variances in two groupes. But in Stata's out…
Help producing line graphHi all, I have somewhat of embarrassing question. I am trying to make a line graph that displays wh…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Singular weighting matrix in 2-step GMM with xtabond2
Post a Comment