Several times recently, I've noticed new questions posted as followups on old (sometime quite old) threads. A recent example would be this .
While this practice reflects that the questioner has made a laudable effort to search for relevant material, I (and perhaps others) find this confusing and not useful. (On the humorous side, I've more than once spent 30 min. writing a response to a posting early in the thread only to discover that the next page has the rest of the thread with the *new* question <grin>.)
I wonder if such followers to old threads are perhaps responding to something in the FAQ? I'd find it more useful to encourage people to make a new posting but include a link to any previous relevant thread. I'd prefer this even when the new question is nearly identical, e.g. "I have this problem that I tried to solved per ThisOldLink, but I'm running into difficulties, ... ."
Any reaction to this, including ideas of how to prompt the link-posting approach, if you think it preferable?
Related Posts with Meta comment re new questions posted as followups to old threads
Equality of two string experessionsHi, I am trying to check if my ID uniquely identifies observations in the data. According to Stata,…
ARDL regression Hello everybody, I regressed gdp growth rate on inflation, share of remittance and share of trade …
Help with data structure transfer for a multiple responses questionHi Statalist, I am a beginner user of Stata. I am trying to write some loop syntax and change the d…
backed up error for probit even when I loosen all tolerancesThis is the option I am adding to the ivprobit that I am using. difficult first tolerance(10) ltole…
Combining observationsHello, I would like to combine the observations, for each study_id in one row example study_id D…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Meta comment re new questions posted as followups to old threads
Post a Comment