Several times recently, I've noticed new questions posted as followups on old (sometime quite old) threads. A recent example would be this .
While this practice reflects that the questioner has made a laudable effort to search for relevant material, I (and perhaps others) find this confusing and not useful. (On the humorous side, I've more than once spent 30 min. writing a response to a posting early in the thread only to discover that the next page has the rest of the thread with the *new* question <grin>.)
I wonder if such followers to old threads are perhaps responding to something in the FAQ? I'd find it more useful to encourage people to make a new posting but include a link to any previous relevant thread. I'd prefer this even when the new question is nearly identical, e.g. "I have this problem that I tried to solved per ThisOldLink, but I'm running into difficulties, ... ."
Any reaction to this, including ideas of how to prompt the link-posting approach, if you think it preferable?
Related Posts with Meta comment re new questions posted as followups to old threads
Calculating all possible combinations per period of one varlistDear STATA users, I’m currently facing the problem of a too-long computation time. I have a large d…
Expand data and replacing multiple observations using elements of a local variableHi all, This is my first post, so I apologize in advance if anything needs clarification. I am wor…
Sample Size using mcnemar test for two dependent binomial populationsHi Statalist users I need your help in estimating the sample size for an interventional study wher…
Adjusting a distributionAssume we are having observational data. There is a continuous outcome variable and a grouping varia…
xtdidregress: the first and last time control group observedHey folks, I am running a difference-in-differences regression on a panel data set. Consider the f…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Meta comment re new questions posted as followups to old threads
Post a Comment