Several times recently, I've noticed new questions posted as followups on old (sometime quite old) threads. A recent example would be this .
While this practice reflects that the questioner has made a laudable effort to search for relevant material, I (and perhaps others) find this confusing and not useful. (On the humorous side, I've more than once spent 30 min. writing a response to a posting early in the thread only to discover that the next page has the rest of the thread with the *new* question <grin>.)
I wonder if such followers to old threads are perhaps responding to something in the FAQ? I'd find it more useful to encourage people to make a new posting but include a link to any previous relevant thread. I'd prefer this even when the new question is nearly identical, e.g. "I have this problem that I tried to solved per ThisOldLink, but I'm running into difficulties, ... ."
Any reaction to this, including ideas of how to prompt the link-posting approach, if you think it preferable?
Related Posts with Meta comment re new questions posted as followups to old threads
Saving tabulated dummy variable scalars (i.variable)Hello, I'm trying to run an estimation for my honours thesis detailed in this paper (open-source ve…
how to obtain the correct AIC / BIC values after a model using [pw=...]Hi everyone, In general, I use -estat ic- or -fitstata- to obtain the bic & aic values after th…
Mixed-Effects Linear Model Set-upHi, I would like to run a mixed-effects linear regression model with cesd as my outcome variable an…
Flagging just one corresponding positive value for every negative valueHi. My dataset has an id variable, a total amount variable and the corresponding date variable. Ther…
Year Fixed effect xtlogitDear All Please, I have seen some posts related to many fixed effect, but I don’t find my case solut…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Meta comment re new questions posted as followups to old threads
Post a Comment