Several times recently, I've noticed new questions posted as followups on old (sometime quite old) threads. A recent example would be this .
While this practice reflects that the questioner has made a laudable effort to search for relevant material, I (and perhaps others) find this confusing and not useful. (On the humorous side, I've more than once spent 30 min. writing a response to a posting early in the thread only to discover that the next page has the rest of the thread with the *new* question <grin>.)
I wonder if such followers to old threads are perhaps responding to something in the FAQ? I'd find it more useful to encourage people to make a new posting but include a link to any previous relevant thread. I'd prefer this even when the new question is nearly identical, e.g. "I have this problem that I tried to solved per ThisOldLink, but I'm running into difficulties, ... ."
Any reaction to this, including ideas of how to prompt the link-posting approach, if you think it preferable?
Related Posts with Meta comment re new questions posted as followups to old threads
Trying to run a predicted probabilities plot with a twoway scatterplot with a splineI accidentally created two threads of the same thing …
GLS for non-linear equationln (Pit) = a*ln(Rit + b*Vit) + uit I want to estimate a, b for wide panel data (i = 1~16, t = 2007~…
match age and genderHello, I would like to know how to match 2:1 for age and gender using same sample of individuals. I …
data management, creating new variables in one data set based on information in another data baseHello All, I hope this email finds you well! I have two databases one includes my raw data, and th…
Tried several variations...need help with graphing a predicted probabilities plot with twoway scatter plot and splinedHi Statalist, I cannot figure out how to do this... the attached graph is exactly what we want, but …
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Meta comment re new questions posted as followups to old threads
Post a Comment