Hi all,
I am working with balanced panel data covering the period of 32 consequent years. I am analyzing the effect of marital status on the life satisfaction. I am treating the variables as cardinal since reg and ologit provide more or less the same results, also Hausman points towards FE rather than RE.
However, I am not sure if I need to include year effects (i.year) in my regression. Currently I am running the conditional fixed effect model (xtlogit) with year dummies and it takes significant time and seems to never provide results. I didn't have this problem before adding the year dummies and I wonder now if that might be the trigger or the big massive of data.
In general answering the question of life satisfaction would require or not controlling for the year effects ?
Thank you!
Kind regards,
Gabriela
Related Posts with Fixed effects regression with or without year dummies?
Question on metacumboundsHi everyone, I would like to seek advice on the metacumbounds package used for trial sequential ana…
Twoway Line: Deleting a straight lineHello, I am trying to create a figure using the code: twoway line sum mdate. The figure shows both a…
scatter graph with different styles and specific axisHi statalist, I have the following data: Code: * Example generated by -dataex-. For more info, ty…
Populating a column with valuesI need to populate the empty columns with corresponding values within that year, it could be that I …
Panel Data fixed effects and time effectsHello there, For my master thesis I am conducting research about the effects of the digital divide o…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Fixed effects regression with or without year dummies?
Post a Comment