Hi all,
I am working with balanced panel data covering the period of 32 consequent years. I am analyzing the effect of marital status on the life satisfaction. I am treating the variables as cardinal since reg and ologit provide more or less the same results, also Hausman points towards FE rather than RE.
However, I am not sure if I need to include year effects (i.year) in my regression. Currently I am running the conditional fixed effect model (xtlogit) with year dummies and it takes significant time and seems to never provide results. I didn't have this problem before adding the year dummies and I wonder now if that might be the trigger or the big massive of data.
In general answering the question of life satisfaction would require or not controlling for the year effects ?
Thank you!
Kind regards,
Gabriela
Related Posts with Fixed effects regression with or without year dummies?
Merging all datasets in directorySometimes datasets come in fragments with a common -ID- variable to merge them by. Merging datasets …
3 way graphPlease see the attached data. I want to make a graph that has year on the x axis and %of ivf use on …
tabout version 3 topf and botf options not working as expectedThe topf and botf options to -tabout- don't appear to be replacing the top and bottom of the latex d…
ITSA DiagnosticsHello, I am using Stata 16's ITSA package to estimate the effect of a court decision on state level …
Child immunization for NigeriaHello everyone. I am working with Stata where I'm trying to combine the different variables on chil…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Fixed effects regression with or without year dummies?
Post a Comment