Hi all,
I am working with balanced panel data covering the period of 32 consequent years. I am analyzing the effect of marital status on the life satisfaction. I am treating the variables as cardinal since reg and ologit provide more or less the same results, also Hausman points towards FE rather than RE.
However, I am not sure if I need to include year effects (i.year) in my regression. Currently I am running the conditional fixed effect model (xtlogit) with year dummies and it takes significant time and seems to never provide results. I didn't have this problem before adding the year dummies and I wonder now if that might be the trigger or the big massive of data.
In general answering the question of life satisfaction would require or not controlling for the year effects ?
Thank you!
Kind regards,
Gabriela
Related Posts with Fixed effects regression with or without year dummies?
Special characters issue PC to MacHello all, I am working on a survey project where the variable and value labels are in French, mean…
Panel bootstrap after Wooldridge (1995) two-step estimatorDear Statalisters, I have a panel data set which suffers from sample selection bias. I am following…
Creating local macro names using a loopHi, this is my first post in the forum, I hope I will do this correctly. I am using Stata 15.1 I ha…
Panel Setting problem, and country-year fixed effectsHi to everyone, Im new in Stata programing, and it would be very helpful if someone gave me an opi…
Panel Setting problem, and country-year fixed effectsHi to everyone, Im new in Stata programing, and it would be very helpful if someone gave me an opi…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Fixed effects regression with or without year dummies?
Post a Comment