Hi all,
I am working with balanced panel data covering the period of 32 consequent years. I am analyzing the effect of marital status on the life satisfaction. I am treating the variables as cardinal since reg and ologit provide more or less the same results, also Hausman points towards FE rather than RE.
However, I am not sure if I need to include year effects (i.year) in my regression. Currently I am running the conditional fixed effect model (xtlogit) with year dummies and it takes significant time and seems to never provide results. I didn't have this problem before adding the year dummies and I wonder now if that might be the trigger or the big massive of data.
In general answering the question of life satisfaction would require or not controlling for the year effects ?
Thank you!
Kind regards,
Gabriela
Related Posts with Fixed effects regression with or without year dummies?
Difference between using l1.var and previously generated lagged variableDear Stata users, I am using Stata 16 on Windows 10 and I'm working on a quarterly dataset of over …
Calculating the Employment-Weighted Mean DifferentialI am currently investigating wage differentials by industry in Germany. My dataset gives me cross-se…
Urgent STATA query please helpI am a complete noob at STATA and am trying to do a subgroup meta analysis but it won't let me creat…
keeping people with the longest durationHi all, I am working with some data and I am trying to keep people with the longest duration from 3…
Adding the scores of imputed group variableHello Statalist, I have a multiply imputed dataset that looks like this Country A B C _mi_m 1 2 2 …
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Fixed effects regression with or without year dummies?
Post a Comment