Hi all,
I am working with balanced panel data covering the period of 32 consequent years. I am analyzing the effect of marital status on the life satisfaction. I am treating the variables as cardinal since reg and ologit provide more or less the same results, also Hausman points towards FE rather than RE.
However, I am not sure if I need to include year effects (i.year) in my regression. Currently I am running the conditional fixed effect model (xtlogit) with year dummies and it takes significant time and seems to never provide results. I didn't have this problem before adding the year dummies and I wonder now if that might be the trigger or the big massive of data.
In general answering the question of life satisfaction would require or not controlling for the year effects ?
Thank you!
Kind regards,
Gabriela
Related Posts with Fixed effects regression with or without year dummies?
marginal effects after STINTREGHi, I am using STINTREG to analyze interval data and as expected, the output is hazard ratios. I wa…
Correcting standard errors for a fixed effects Poisson modelHi all, I'm looking at the effect of fire occurrence on the number of visits to National Forests an…
Question about generating a small table, having issues with getting the categories set up as I wantGood day, I would like to create a simple table (I use multiple imputations) with 2 variables I wan…
Problem with two step difference/system GMM estimator using "xtabond2"Dear all, It is my first post on Statalist, I hope I am doing everything fine, I read all the FAQs …
Forval simulation, 100 timesDear Stalist, I want to run and repeat this command line 100 times and then after the repetition, ta…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Fixed effects regression with or without year dummies?
Post a Comment