Hi All,
For those who are familiar with the Frankel and Romer (1999) study, the authors construct instruments for bilateral trade in a first stage, where they regress bilateral trade on geographic variables. Thereafter, they obtain the predicted values of trade based on geography for a country pair, and then aggregate over trading partners for a particular country to obtain the exogenous fraction of trade for a particular country. THis is then used as an instrument for the trade, to analyze the effect of trade on income.
Silva and Tenreyro (2006) suggested the use of a PPML type estimator as it is more robust to inclusion of 0 trade flows as well as heteroskedasticity in the trade data in the construction of the instrument.
One problem common to both approaches is that the instrument is "generated", in that it is itself measured with error as it is based on predicted values in its construction. This introduces complications in the interpretation of the standard error in the final stage.
One solution is to bootstrap the standard errors in the final stage. Is there any command that allows for boostrapping in combination with either the iv or 2sls command?
Many thanks,
CS
Related Posts with Standard Errors in the Frankel and Romer type study, using PPML
Model Specification - Generalized DiD or TWFE Model (Need Suggesstions)Hello everyone, I am estimating the effect of a law change on certain policies for the US states. T…
Import and reshape data while capturing variable label from ExcelHello, I have 115 worksheets (each of them has about 100 variables) from excel to work with and the…
Categorical values conditional on a date (by group)Hi everyone, I'm new to this forum. Hopefully you are doing fine while reading my post. My question …
Descriptive statistics tableI'm looking to create a descriptive statistics table, grouped by experimental condition. The table w…
How to calculate annual event rates for use in Kaplan-Meier graphHi Stata-users I would like to depict a Kaplan-Meier failure estimate graph with annual event rates…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Standard Errors in the Frankel and Romer type study, using PPML
Post a Comment