Hello all,
I am using GEE to estimate my dependent variable. The dependent variable has a lower bound of 0 (its observed value, not censored or truncated) and can take on larger values as well. However, in my dataset, there are a lot of zeros for the dependent variable (about 80% of the time). Would it be acceptable to run a linear GEE model here? (assuming that I probe my results using alternative approaches). From what I understand, GEE is a quasi-likelihood estimator and it has weaker distributional assumptions, so my thoughts were that this would be okay, but I'd be interested in hearing others thoughts. Though to be clear, I am interested in using and defending this approach for my analysis purposes.
Thank you in advance!
Related Posts with GEE and distributional assumptions
Format stata summary output table with multiple variables Code: * Example generated by -dataex-. To install: ssc install dataex clear input str6 Gender floa…
Monthly variation in incidence: exposure in Poisson regressionI am trying to estimate the variation of a disease incidence by month. The disease incidence should …
Questions about two-wayHi I need to customize my graph that is plotted by twoway scatter as follows: 1-drawing a diagonal l…
A problem with iteration log likelihood not concave in xtpmg commandHi everyone, When I run the PMG model by xtpmg command, I have a problem the iteration log likelihoo…
Difference-in-differences: regress or teffects?Dear Statalist users, I have been working on trying to find whether there has been a positive impact…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to GEE and distributional assumptions
Post a Comment