I seem to have found some unexpected (to me) behaviour from the -table- command. A reproducible example is pasted below which describes a sample size calculation carried out using -power-, and then summarizing the results of total sample size into a neat table.
Code:
power twoproportions (0.05(0.05).3), power(0.9) diff(.05 .1 .15 .2) alpha(0.05) effect(diff) saving("mypowertable.dta", replace) use mypowertable table p2 p1 [fw=N], contents(freq) format(%5.0f) concise missing
Code:
---------------------------------------------- | p1 p2 | .05 .1 .15 .2 .25 .3 ----------+----------------------------------- .1 | 1164 . . . . . .15 | 376 1836 . . . . .2 | 202 532 2424 . . . .25 | 130 266 670 2928 . . .3 | . . 322 . 3348 . .3 | . 164 . 784 . . .35 | . . 194 370 880 3684 .4 | . . . 218 406 954 .45 | . . . . . 434 .45 | . . . . 236 . .5 | . . . . . 248 ----------------------------------------------
Code:
---------------------------------------------- | p1 p2 | .05 .1 .15 .2 .25 .3 ----------+----------------------------------- .1 | 1164 . . . . . .15 | 376 1836 . . . . .2 | 202 532 2424 . . . .25 | 130 266 670 2928 . . .3 | . 164 322 784 3348 . .35 | . . 194 370 880 3684 .4 | . . . 218 406 954 .45 | . . . . 236 434 .5 | . . . . . 248 ----------------------------------------------
0 Response to Problems with spread out rows when using table
Post a Comment