I am running the following mixed model (code and results shown below). Notes: Y is continuous, dar is continuous, alp is dichotomous, mup is dichotomous, and zol is dichotomous.
Y = 70.63 + -.144 dar + .0039 dar2 + -.00003 dar3 + 7.57 alp + 18.59 mup + 11.28 zol + -6.302 mup*zol
This is how I interpret the coefficients:
- constant = value of Y when all variables=0
- dar, dar2 ,and dar3 => will plot the results.
- alp (not part of interaction), I interpret as: increase in Y for alp=1 v. alp=0
- mup (part of interaction): change in Y when move from mup=0 to mup=1 when zol=0
- zol (part of interaction): change in Y when move from zol=0 to zol=1 when mup=0
- mup*zol: difference in Y when move from mup=0 to mup=1 for zol=1 v. zol=0
My questions:
- For variables NOT included in an interaction (e.g. alp), since they are not in an interaction, are they interpreted in the same way as if the interaction was not in the model? For example, I interpret alp as "increase in Y for alp=1 v. alp=0." This interpretation does not mention any other variables.
- For the variables INCLUDED in the interaction (mup, zol, and mup*zol); are they only interpreted with respect to the other variables included in the interaction? (and not other variables in the model). For example, I interpret mup as "change in Y when move from mup=0 to mup=1 when zol=0".
Not sure if this is clear enough but would appreciate any comments. THANK YOU!!!
Code:
. mixed lex c.dar##c.dar##c.dar i.alp i.mup i.zol i.mup#i.zol || _all: R.bor || _all: R.mol || _all: R.pop, reml Performing EM optimization: Performing gradient-based optimization: Iteration 0: log restricted-likelihood = -55055.98 Iteration 1: log restricted-likelihood = -55055.98 Computing standard errors: Mixed-effects REML regression Number of obs = 12,040 Group variable: _all Number of groups = 1 Obs per group: min = 12,040 avg = 12,040.0 max = 12,040 Wald chi2(7) = 558.36 Log restricted-likelihood = -55055.98 Prob > chi2 = 0.0000 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- lex | Coef. Std. Err. z P>|z| [95% Conf. Interval] ------------------+---------------------------------------------------------------- dar | -.1442413 .0679903 -2.12 0.034 -.2774999 -.0109827 | c.dar#c.dar | .0039578 .0017025 2.32 0.020 .000621 .0072946 | c.dar#c.dar#c.dar | -.0000359 .0000113 -3.19 0.001 -.000058 -.0000138 | 1.alp | 7.56537 1.792743 4.22 0.000 4.051658 11.07908 1.mup | 18.59015 2.898774 6.41 0.000 12.90866 24.27164 1.zol | 11.27925 .6055326 18.63 0.000 10.09243 12.46607 | mup#zol | 1 1 | -6.30276 .8396218 -7.51 0.000 -7.948388 -4.657131 | _cons | 70.63327 2.85485 24.74 0.000 65.03787 76.22868 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Random-effects Parameters | Estimate Std. Err. [95% Conf. Interval] -----------------------------+------------------------------------------------ _all: Identity | var(R.bor) | 81.68924 16.43907 55.06427 121.1881 -----------------------------+------------------------------------------------ _all: Identity | var(R.mol) | 47.87758 14.45347 26.49525 86.51596 -----------------------------+------------------------------------------------ _all: Identity | var(R.pop) | 42.53744 8.664709 28.53546 63.41 -----------------------------+------------------------------------------------ var(Residual) | 528.271 6.84953 515.0153 541.8679 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ LR test vs. linear model: chi2(3) = 2653.43 Prob > chi2 = 0.0000 Note: LR test is conservative and provided only for reference. . . margins i.alp i.mup i.zol i.mup#i.zol Predictive margins Number of obs = 12,040 Expression : Linear prediction, fixed portion, predict() ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | Delta-method | Margin Std. Err. z P>|z| [95% Conf. Interval] -------------+---------------------------------------------------------------- alp | 0 | 81.48609 2.200303 37.03 0.000 77.17357 85.7986 1 | 89.05146 2.200272 40.47 0.000 84.739 93.36391 | mup | 0 | 77.23285 2.501806 30.87 0.000 72.3294 82.1363 1 | 92.66743 2.435716 38.05 0.000 87.89351 97.44134 | zol | 0 | 81.26372 2.020338 40.22 0.000 77.30393 85.22351 1 | 89.26177 2.020341 44.18 0.000 85.30197 93.22156 | mup#zol | 0 0 | 71.58573 2.518609 28.42 0.000 66.64934 76.52211 0 1 | 82.86498 2.521506 32.86 0.000 77.92292 87.80704 1 0 | 90.17588 2.45509 36.73 0.000 85.36399 94.98776 1 1 | 95.15237 2.450946 38.82 0.000 90.3486 99.95613 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 Response to interpretation of interactions in mixed model
Post a Comment