Hello!
Thank you to all who takes the time to answer the questions in this forum, you are doing a great job. This place is a fantastic source of information for newcomers like myself.
So, to my problem. I am currently working on a bachelor thesis and i have gotten my thoughts all tangled up.
I am looking at the effect the change in the marginal tax between 2 years have on individuals number och sick days. I believe the models are fine as they are although i might add or remove a couple of controls. I am trying to get the elasticities out of this with a log log model.
I do not truly understand the fundementals of this type of model.
I am supposed to measure the difference between year 1990 and 1991, yet i have a hard time understanding the output here.
For year 1990 the lnmrtax coefficient is reasonable considering that when marginal tax increases by 10% it is more expensive to work so the sick days increases with 1.5% at that case.
But what i don't understand is how to interpret the coefficient for year 1991. What is good to know here is that a huge tax reform took place in 1991 and that the general marginal tax rates decreased, especially for high income earners.
The FE model. Where inkap = capital income.
Code:
xtreg lnsickdays lnmrtax i.year high_age inkap, fe vce(robust)
Fixed-effects (within) regression Number of obs = 268,541
Group variable: bidnr Number of groups = 139,677
R-sq: Obs per group:
within = 0.0190 min = 1
between = 0.0201 avg = 1.9
overall = 0.0004 max = 2
F(4,139676) = 624.11
corr(u_i, Xb) = -0.0691 Prob > F = 0.0000
(Std. Err. adjusted for 139,677 clusters in bidnr)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Robust
lnsickdays | Coef. Std. Err. t P>|t| [95% Conf. Interval]
-------------+----------------------------------------------------------------
lnmrtax | .1533314 .0264629 5.79 0.000 .1014646 .2051983
|
year |
1991 | -.1905544 .0076254 -24.99 0.000 -.2055 -.1756087
|
high_age | .0424174 . 0252012 1.68 0.092 -.0069765 .0918113
inkap | -1.05e-08 1.50e-08 -0.70 0.483 -3.98e-08 1.88e-08
_cons | 1.218533 .1009946 12.07 0.000 1.020586 1.41648
-------------+----------------------------------------------------------------
sigma_u | 1.3147138
sigma_e | 1.1483978
rho | .56721627 (fraction of variance due to u_i)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
So, to the real question here: Can i consider the coefficient for year1991 to be the value for lnmrtax in 1991 with the same controls? Or is it to be interpreted as lnmrtax + year1991?
As you probably see i struggle to comprehend the basics of this model for comparing the effect over 2 years.
I apologize in advance if this port does not fully meet the standars of Statalist. I have read the FAQ before posting and tried my best.
Any answer will be much appreciated and possibly save me from huge anxiety during the holidays.
I wish you all a great christmas and a happy new year.
Respecfully
Viktor Öberg
Related Posts with Help with interpreting a log-log fixed effect model
Standard output lostIn Windows 10 with Stata 16 if I log in as "admin" and issue the Stata command -pwd- Stata returns d…
Generating Time Variable in Panel DataHi, I am working with two rounds of Indian Development Human Survey Data of round 1 and 2 (individu…
Logistic regression, propensity score matching, or IPTW?Hello, I would like to compare the "adjusted" mortality after surgery between two cohorts with very…
Automated means to export elasticity outputs after estimating Almost Ideal Demand System (AIDS) using the Stata command 'aidsills'?Dear Statalisters, I have been running AIDS demand systems for several population subgroups using th…
local variable definition based of last character of string variable being odd or evenHi, I am trying to define a local variable based on the last character of global variable (M_crisis…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Help with interpreting a log-log fixed effect model
Post a Comment