Hello,
I am confused about a simple issue: Imagine a cross-sectional dataset with plenty of ids.
If including a control variable in a regression when this control variable has more missings (less observations) than the dependent variable, will the observations about one id (i.e. the observations of the dependent and other variables) then be dropped, too, because the control variable is missing?
In other words, will I lose information about the remaining variables because of a scarce control variable?
I tried to figure this out myself and noticed the number of observations decreases the same amount like I simulated missings, so this should mean nothing else will be dropped, right?
Would greatly appreciate advice. Thank you!
Rebecca
Related Posts with Basics - Including control variable with many missings in regression
Repeated-Measure Ancova with Participants Randomized within Each Treatment/ConditionI think I want to use Repeated-Measure Anova command, "anova, repeated ()" or "wsanova" commands bas…
Unconditional Quantile Regression (rifreg) with an Interaction Term; and an independent percentile score variableHi all, we have a panel data set (defined by firms and years) and are trying to estimate the followi…
Collinearity with time dummies in FE, but not in REHey, I'm trying to fit a panel regression. I start by using: HTML Code: xtset Year country_id I th…
New package: xtbreak - module for detecting and dating multiple structural breaks in time series and panel dataI am excited to announce a new package on SSC (thanks to Kit Baum): xtbreak. xtbreak provides resea…
Again on revisiting the role of p-valueDear All, those interested in this debate may find the following article interesting: https://ift.tt…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Basics - Including control variable with many missings in regression
Post a Comment