I've been trying to understand the interpretation of the Arellano-Bond test when using FOD for system GMM. Is it the same? Normally you would expect AR(1) to be significant but since the data may be from a future time period, is this still the case? Many thanks for any help you can provide.
Related Posts with xtabond2: interpretation of Arellano-Bond test using forward orthogonal deviations
Instrumental variables for multilevel data.Good morning, I am writing to ask you a question about the use of instrumental variables if my data…
Standard errors for each replication(iteration) in bootstrapHello, I am trying to figure out if there is a way of saving all the individual standard errors one …
combine columns and rows into one rowHello Users, Please help with data transformation. The current data format: sub-var1 sub-var2 sub-v…
nlcom: Maximum number of iterations exceededHello everyone, I used nlcom to estimate marginal effects after craggit and I keep getting this err…
Generating variable that contains (partly) the value of another variableHi everyone, I am currently working with M&A-data and I came across a challenge. I have construc…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to xtabond2: interpretation of Arellano-Bond test using forward orthogonal deviations
Post a Comment