I've been trying to understand the interpretation of the Arellano-Bond test when using FOD for system GMM. Is it the same? Normally you would expect AR(1) to be significant but since the data may be from a future time period, is this still the case? Many thanks for any help you can provide.
Related Posts with xtabond2: interpretation of Arellano-Bond test using forward orthogonal deviations
Questions for "drop" participants in long data format for repeated mesurements.Hello! I'd like to ask how to drop observations in such follwing dataset. See the pic below for dat…
install ado filesHello, I am trying to install some ado files which I downloaded from a website in my stata. I read …
Generating a variable that tracks the first time 2 IDs appear simultaneouslyHi, I am new to Stata, so I am not very familiar with the codes. I have a dataset with multiple var…
Generate a count variable capturing # of times a value occurs in categorical variablesDear Stata users, I have a panel data set with 14 string variables each of which indicates whether …
Significance levels in StataHello, I have a question on how Stata calculates significance levels. When I get a P-value of 0.00…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to xtabond2: interpretation of Arellano-Bond test using forward orthogonal deviations
Post a Comment