I've been trying to understand the interpretation of the Arellano-Bond test when using FOD for system GMM. Is it the same? Normally you would expect AR(1) to be significant but since the data may be from a future time period, is this still the case? Many thanks for any help you can provide.
Related Posts with xtabond2: interpretation of Arellano-Bond test using forward orthogonal deviations
What is the difference between xtreg ,mle versus reg ,(cluster id), can I use the results of one to confirm the results of the otherHi, My supervisor and staticien are asking me to run my panel regression with two methods, xtreg ,m…
Replacing value with previous value if value is outside certain intervalHi everyone, I have the following panel data (in total 1200 observations) Country Year ACC_POP A…
If and commandHello, Can you help me please with my following issue? I have a panel data set and I want to figure…
Confidence intervals for gradients in npregressDear all, I'm trying to estimate confidence intervals for my gradients after performing a kernel re…
How do i include the results of a no observations regression into a matrix?So my problem is that i have a dataset of 502 firms but some of them have no observations. The thing…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to xtabond2: interpretation of Arellano-Bond test using forward orthogonal deviations
Post a Comment