Dear all,
I am running a probit model (since my dependent variable is binary) using Fixed Effects (I need to include them in my model). My data are cross-section data (not panel data), so I am running:
probit Dependent x1 x2 x3 i.region i.industry
I have just realized that using probit with fixed firm effects gives biased/inconsistent estimates and standard errors due to the incidental parameters problem.
How can I address this problem? I have read some about solutions (probitfe or xtspj) but they are all designed for panel data. So, I would appreciate if you could tell how could I run this kind of estimation not incurring into the incidental parameters problem.
Thanks in advance.
Related Posts with Correction for Probit with FE (Cross-section) - Incidental parameters
Write ado command with function defined on MataI am writing an ado file and I use structures like: program define XX, eclass myfunction() ereturn m…
Calculating Marginal EffectsDear all, I have had some trouble calculating one of the marginal effects of my regression. I am ru…
Difference-in-differenceHi everyone, I conducted an experiment where 2 parameters (alpha, beta) using 6 different methods w…
including a legend with labels in an overlay graphDear all, I would like to add to an overlay plot a legend, that gives for every color used the name…
Generate a new variable adding observations of a different columnHello, I have the following dataset: Code: * Example generated by -dataex-. To install: ssc insta…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Correction for Probit with FE (Cross-section) - Incidental parameters
Post a Comment