Hello:
Across 10 years or so, I used different versions of Stata regularly. Then, I didn't use Stata at all across three years as an administrator. Now, back to my normal position, I'm trying to refresh my capacity to use Stata, currently, in particular, SEM. For some trials with a dataset, I keep getting this indication: "Note: The LR test of model vs. saturated is not reported because the fitted model is not full rank." (I don't recall every seeing this in my prior SEM work with Stata.)
I have searched about in Statalist and elsewhere on the web. There are assorted posts about this, but I can't find a clear explanation of why this indication appears, what it may mean, and how one can alter a dataset or model to address it.
Thanks for any help with this.
Chris
Related Posts with SEM: the fitted*model is not full rank
How to proceed with variables with Unit Root or non stationarity using fixed effects estimation??I have a data set of N=280 and T =60. I did fisher test for each of my 9 variables. Only two have un…
%e formatHi, I'm confused with the definition of %e format. I'm doing IV regression for panel data. I used …
sureg with standard errorsDear all, I use sureg to run regressions on 5 equations. The default from sureg command is t statis…
Levels Problem in RegressionI hope you are doing well. I am facing a problem with levels in model specification. I have an inde…
None of the by options are working with twoway graphHi, I am trying to use the ixaxes iyaxes and imargin options for byopts in this twoway histogram pl…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to SEM: the fitted*model is not full rank
Post a Comment