I am implementing system GMM using the xtabond2 command. The data series is very long. This long history generates a very high number of instrumental variables (IV) which creates a significantly over identified result. Unfortunately, when I include the collapse option, the results change from what is observed in previous literature and don’t make intuitive sense. I suspect the averaging of the individual instruments across all the observations is reducing the information necessary to produce meaningful coefficients. Do you know how to modify the collapse option so that the IV matrix only collapses the earlier observations of the instrument matrix and leaves the more recent observations? Thank you, Dan
Related Posts with Modifying the collapse option in the xtabond2 command
Combining Categorical VariablesHello, When I designed my survey for my research project I had a question that was repeated. Since …
Recall: The use of pweights with regressHello Statalisters, I have been searching for an answer to the following question: "Can anyone poin…
Introducing kobo2stata (new on SSC)Dear Statalisters (and especially the Kobo users among you), I am pleased to announce that a new St…
Saving coefficients in a columnDear All, I estimate a spatial regression model and then I calculate the marginal impact of the reg…
Total Factor Productivity Measurement through Production Function ApproachI intend to measure the TFP of manufacturing firms for 23 states through Production Function Approac…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Modifying the collapse option in the xtabond2 command
Post a Comment