Hi Statalist members,
I'm running the ordered logit model and find struggling how to interpret the results of an interaction term of two continuous variables.
My dependent variable is debt maturity, which takes a value of 1 if a firm use long term debt, 2 if a firm only uses short term debt and 3 if a firm does not use any long term or short term debt in a given year. Although I know this order is quite ambiguous to Stata experts here ( and most of you will recommend me to use the multinomial logit, which seems not work with my dataset), please ignore that issue in this post.
My main variable of interest is firm cash flow volatility (CFV)
My model is Debt maturity = alpha + beta_1 * CFV + beta_2 * other firm-level control variables + beta_3 * country-level variables + error term
Now I would like to test if a country's banking system strengthen or weaken the influence of cash flow volatility on debt maturity.
The additional mode is alpha + beta_1 * CFV + beta_2 * other firm-level control variables + beta_3 * country-level variables + beta_4* bank*CFV) + error term
I searched and found a few useful posts in this forum, suggesting I should use the margin command to figure out the effect of an interaction term and I can't interpret the coefficient of CFV as in the model without interactions any more. However, I still don't know how to interpret the results after getting the marginal effect of CFV and interaction.
Here are the cash flow volatility marginal effects ( on three categories of debt maturity)
Delta-method
dy/dx Std. Err. z P>z [95% Conf. Interval]
KS_oi_5_w01
_predict
1 -.0011547 .0002561 -4.51 0.000 -.0016566 -.0006528
2 .0003506 .0000782 4.48 0.000 .0001972 .0005039
3 .0008041 .0001782 4.51 0.000 .0004548 .0011535
And here are the interaction of the banking system and cash flow volatility marginal effects
Delta-method
dy/dx Std. Err. z P>z [95% Conf. Interval]
baKS
_predict
1 -5.32e-06 2.52e-06 -2.11 0.035 -.0000103 -3.70e-07
2 1.61e-06 7.67e-07 2.10 0.035 1.10e-07 3.12e-06
3 3.70e-06 1.76e-06 2.11 0.035 2.58e-07 7.15e-06
Any help would appreciate.
Regards.
Huyen
Huyen
Related Posts with Interpret interaction term of two continuous variables after ordered logit estimation.
R squared equals 1 when running spatial fixed effectsHello everyone, I´ve been asked to show that, when you run your outcome variable against your geogr…
Bankcountryyear fixed effectsDear all, could you please kindly confirm, that the following code would mean "bankcountryyear" fix…
t statistic (p-value) of lower order coefficients in models with interaction termsHi, In the following system GMM model based on a panel dataset of 1696 firms across 16 years, I am …
Cell Extraction and reading data Hello, I have an extraction issue in Stata. I want to extract a specific cell from Stata data base…
verifying a condition for three consecutive years in panel dataHello everyone, this is my first post here and I'm relatively new to Stata so I was hoping to get so…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Interpret interaction term of two continuous variables after ordered logit estimation.
Post a Comment