Dear all,
I have come across 2 methods of addressing endogeneity in ppml models, the use of bilateral country-pair fixed effects and the iv-poisson model. I would like to inquire about the rationale behind the two models, i.e. when is it advisable to use bilateral country-pair fixed effects or the iv-poisson?
Related Posts with Addressing endogeneity in PPML
Non-normal distribution of latent variable in structural equations modelling - transformation?I have a simple path model with several latent variables that are ostensibly well enough indicated b…
Constrained optimization in StataDear Stata uses, I am having a constant optimization problem to solve in Stata I am having three var…
Tobit with vce(robust) or notHi, When I run tobit model specifying vce(robust), it does F test to test the hypothesis that the co…
Ordered Logit, Multinomial Logit- InterpretationsI am trying to run ordered logit for a dependent variable that takes values -1,0,1. Suppose educatio…
Effective Reproductive NumberHello! Is there a way to calculate Effective Reproductive Number (Rt) in STATA? Thank you very muc…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Addressing endogeneity in PPML
Post a Comment