Dear all,
I have come across 2 methods of addressing endogeneity in ppml models, the use of bilateral country-pair fixed effects and the iv-poisson model. I would like to inquire about the rationale behind the two models, i.e. when is it advisable to use bilateral country-pair fixed effects or the iv-poisson?
Related Posts with Addressing endogeneity in PPML
spmap optionsHello, I used -spmap- to map US employment and this is the code I used: Code: spmap cbp_emp_sum u…
Median, Tercile and QuartileHi, I want to create dummy variables based on the median. Sometiems I do that based on quartile and …
Overlapping values on y axis in Stata graphArray Hi, is there a way to avoid overlapping of numbers on the y axis …
Outreg2 to Excel R(198) error diagnosisI am trying to run the below code in STATA 16.1. STATA is fully updated, and I've uninstalled and re…
New version of xcontract )AGAIN) on SSCThanks once again to Kit Baum, a new version of the xcontract package (superseding yesterday's versi…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Addressing endogeneity in PPML
Post a Comment