I have an issue regarding xtabond2 and Hansen statistics and I was wondering if anyone could help me with that.
Here is my code and what Stata provides:
Code:
xtabond2 winv2 wndf wdiv2 wcf wmtb wtang cage wsalesg wsize l.stdev l.winv2 y4-y32, gmmstyle(l.winv2 wndf > wdiv2, lag(2 5) collapse) iv( wmtb wcf wtang l.stdev cage wsalesg wsize y4-y32, eq(level)) iv(wmtb wcf wta > ng l.stdev cage wsalesg wsize, eq(diff)) twostep small robust Favoring space over speed. To switch, type or click on mata: mata set matafavor speed, perm. Dynamic panel-data estimation, two-step system GMM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Group variable: companyno Number of obs = 4925 Time variable : datayearfi~l Number of groups = 463 Number of instruments = 59 Obs per group: min = 1 F(39, 462) = 14.51 avg = 10.64 Prob > F = 0.000 max = 30 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | Corrected winv2 | Coef. Std. Err. t P>|t| [95% Conf. Interval] -------------+---------------------------------------------------------------- wndf | .5197724 .0736962 7.05 0.000 .3749511 .6645937 wdiv2 | -.0761525 .0361605 -2.11 0.036 -.1472119 -.005093 wcf | .1376568 .0394813 3.49 0.001 .0600716 .215242 wmtb | .0065393 .0032135 2.03 0.042 .0002244 .0128543 wtang | .031711 .0093283 3.40 0.001 .0133798 .0500421 cage | -.0117218 .0047613 -2.46 0.014 -.0210783 -.0023652 wsalesg | .0277694 .010588 2.62 0.009 .0069628 .048576 wsize | .0029869 .0013757 2.17 0.030 .0002836 .0056903 | stdev | L1. | -.1754014 .1576928 -1.11 0.267 -.4852853 .1344825 | winv2 | L1. | .1345404 .0392788 3.43 0.001 .0573531 .2117277 | y4 | -.0670014 .0490034 -1.37 0.172 -.1632986 .0292958 y5 | -.0764702 .0436855 -1.75 0.081 -.1623172 .0093768 y6 | -.0466703 .043778 -1.07 0.287 -.132699 .0393584 y7 | -.0535834 .039934 -1.34 0.180 -.1320582 .0248914 y8 | -.0046665 .0448924 -0.10 0.917 -.0928851 .083552 y9 | -.0310349 .0449769 -0.69 0.491 -.1194196 .0573498 y10 | -.0266905 .0421176 -0.63 0.527 -.1094563 .0560752 y11 | -.047943 .0454478 -1.05 0.292 -.137253 .041367 y12 | -.0457779 .0416776 -1.10 0.273 -.127679 .0361233 y13 | -.0440037 .0414834 -1.06 0.289 -.1255232 .0375157 y14 | -.0183853 .0432421 -0.43 0.671 -.1033609 .0665902 y15 | -.0394861 .0432887 -0.91 0.362 -.1245532 .0455809 y16 | -.0272495 .0436253 -0.62 0.533 -.1129781 .058479 y17 | -.0428482 .0433147 -0.99 0.323 -.1279664 .04227 y18 | -.0159717 .0433348 -0.37 0.713 -.1011294 .0691861 y19 | -.0042772 .0432104 -0.10 0.921 -.0891906 .0806361 y20 | -.0204746 .0426472 -0.48 0.631 -.1042811 .0633319 y21 | -.0016345 .043723 -0.04 0.970 -.087555 .0842861 y22 | -.0181546 .042542 -0.43 0.670 -.1017543 .0654451 y23 | -.0264723 .0429187 -0.62 0.538 -.1108123 .0578677 y24 | -.0299797 .0425649 -0.70 0.482 -.1136245 .0536651 y25 | -.0318005 .0421004 -0.76 0.450 -.1145325 .0509314 y26 | -.0389249 .0422431 -0.92 0.357 -.1219373 .0440875 y27 | -.0237457 .0427874 -0.55 0.579 -.1078278 .0603365 y28 | -.02853 .042558 -0.67 0.503 -.1121612 .0551012 y29 | -.0178813 .0427483 -0.42 0.676 -.1018865 .0661239 y30 | -.0284094 .0426339 -0.67 0.506 -.1121898 .055371 y31 | -.0375211 .0422606 -0.89 0.375 -.120568 .0455257 y32 | -.0400235 .0424093 -0.94 0.346 -.1233625 .0433156 _cons | .0029791 .0440888 0.07 0.946 -.0836603 .0896185 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Instruments for first differences equation Standard D.(wmtb wcf wtang L.stdev cage wsalesg wsize) GMM-type (missing=0, separate instruments for each period unless collapsed) L(2/5).(L.winv2 wndf wdiv2) collapsed Instruments for levels equation Standard _cons wmtb wcf wtang L.stdev cage wsalesg wsize y4 y5 y6 y7 y8 y9 y10 y11 y12 y13 y14 y15 y16 y17 y18 y19 y20 y21 y22 y23 y24 y25 y26 y27 y28 y29 y30 y31 y32 GMM-type (missing=0, separate instruments for each period unless collapsed) DL.(L.winv2 wndf wdiv2) collapsed ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Arellano-Bond test for AR(1) in first differences: z = -6.77 Pr > z = 0.000 Arellano-Bond test for AR(2) in first differences: z = 0.84 Pr > z = 0.400 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Sargan test of overid. restrictions: chi2(19) = 110.06 Prob > chi2 = 0.000 (Not robust, but not weakened by many instruments.) Hansen test of overid. restrictions: chi2(19) = 32.49 Prob > chi2 = 0.027 (Robust, but can be weakened by many instruments.) Difference-in-Hansen tests of exogeneity of instrument subsets: GMM instruments for levels Hansen test excluding group: chi2(16) = 30.31 Prob > chi2 = 0.016 Difference (null H = exogenous): chi2(3) = 2.18 Prob > chi2 = 0.536 gmm(L.winv2 wndf wdiv2, collapse lag(2 5)) Hansen test excluding group: chi2(4) = 17.36 Prob > chi2 = 0.002 Difference (null H = exogenous): chi2(15) = 15.14 Prob > chi2 = 0.442 iv(wmtb wcf wtang L.stdev cage wsalesg wsize, eq(diff)) Hansen test excluding group: chi2(12) = 14.38 Prob > chi2 = 0.277 Difference (null H = exogenous): chi2(7) = 18.12 Prob > chi2 = 0.011 .
Many thanks.
0 Response to Highly significant Hansen statistics after xtabond2
Post a Comment