I'm running some regression models with panel data from Brazilian municipalities (N = 64,708, Number of groups = 5,561, T = 3).
The results seem ok at first, but:
1. The overall R2 is almost null: 0.0008
2. rho = .9917
3. corr(u_i, Xb) = -0.9928
What do these pieces of information suggest about the convenience of running FE models versus running pooled OLS?
Related Posts with Fixed effects model with high rho and negative corr(u_i, Xb): a problem?
save regression results for margins plotingMy question is straightforward. Could Stata save regression results so that I do not have to re-run …
Multiplying observations in a variable listIn a dataset of multiple variable lists, I would like to multiply the value of only selected variabl…
Estimate the difference-in-differences estimatorHi, I restricted my wave sample from 1-10 to 9-10 and I was wondering how would i use the command b…
Interpretation of Competing Risk with stcrregI'm new to using competing risk analysis and want to make sure I'm interpreting and using it correct…
Combining variables in the variable list by countryI am looking at the dataset where I have three variable lists: life expectancy by country for specif…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Fixed effects model with high rho and negative corr(u_i, Xb): a problem?
Post a Comment