I'm running some regression models with panel data from Brazilian municipalities (N = 64,708, Number of groups = 5,561, T = 3).
The results seem ok at first, but:
1. The overall R2 is almost null: 0.0008
2. rho = .9917
3. corr(u_i, Xb) = -0.9928
What do these pieces of information suggest about the convenience of running FE models versus running pooled OLS?
Related Posts with Fixed effects model with high rho and negative corr(u_i, Xb): a problem?
PcaHi dears, I would like to have help with the PCA. I have a dataset with ten variables, most of all f…
How to design a correct twoway scatter graph?Good morning to the community. I would like to design a graph like this:Array But I would like fir…
How to specify residual correlation structure in glmHello all, I'm trying to fit a Poisson model to the rate of hospitalizations for children under 5 y…
Interface bug with framesDear Statalist users, I am running across an interface error that seems to be a bug in Stata 17 whe…
Bootstrapping s.e. with country FEs - Two-stage estimation with fractional logit in second stage.Hi, I am running a two stage regression, where the first stage is a linear regression of a price in…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Fixed effects model with high rho and negative corr(u_i, Xb): a problem?
Post a Comment