I'm running some regression models with panel data from Brazilian municipalities (N = 64,708, Number of groups = 5,561, T = 3).
The results seem ok at first, but:
1. The overall R2 is almost null: 0.0008
2. rho = .9917
3. corr(u_i, Xb) = -0.9928
What do these pieces of information suggest about the convenience of running FE models versus running pooled OLS?
Related Posts with Fixed effects model with high rho and negative corr(u_i, Xb): a problem?
Appropriateness of Fixed Effects when using a dummy that is only time variant for some panel units.I am looking to estimate the impact of the presence of a fiscal council on a country's real growth f…
Problem with specifying a range of year or listing yearsHello, I am quite new to Stata and am trying to analyse some time series data but am having some is…
Sorted bar graphs by year for multiple variables Code: * Example generated by -dataex-. To install: ssc install dataex clear input str32 country in…
Problem with opening the datasetHi Stata community. I am trying to open a .dta dataset, which I have been working on for the last fo…
Group and label variables (perhaps using -rangejoin-)Hello, my following problem seems to me as being pretty complicated. However, I will try to explain…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Fixed effects model with high rho and negative corr(u_i, Xb): a problem?
Post a Comment