Hello Stata users!
I am doing a Latent Profile Analysis with continuous indicators (gsem, lclass option). These indicators are probably not locally independent as some of them are symptoms that are probably dependent on each other (e.g. pain, anxiety, depression) and some are beliefs that relate to these symptoms (e.g. self-efficacy).
I read Canette's 2017 presentation where she states that conditional independence is not necessary with Gaussian variables and that we can include correlations among them.
Does this imply that we can disregard the assumption of local independence, or that we should explicitly relax the assumption for locally dependent variables within a class?
The latter seem to be suggested by others (e.g. by allowing error terms to covary within a class for these variables).
If the latter, how would one identify the locally dependent indicators in Stata, if possible?
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Best regards,
Martin
Related Posts with Latent profile analysis with continuous indicators and local independence
Nearest Neighbor Matching without Treatment Effects?I'm trying to do nearest neighbor matching in STATA 15 for Windows, but I'm just looking for matches…
Standard Errors in the Frankel and Romer type study, using PPMLHi All, For those who are familiar with the Frankel and Romer (1999) study, the authors construct …
Functional Forms of Independent VariablesHi, If our objective is to ascertain the relationship (specifically, sign and significance of Beta …
How to expand results window?Good morning, I have item descriptions being cut off in results window, so getting an output with pa…
multiple rows loopDear stata members, I am trying to calculate the squared sum of all dyadic values in a group using …
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Latent profile analysis with continuous indicators and local independence
Post a Comment