Hello Stata users!
I am doing a Latent Profile Analysis with continuous indicators (gsem, lclass option). These indicators are probably not locally independent as some of them are symptoms that are probably dependent on each other (e.g. pain, anxiety, depression) and some are beliefs that relate to these symptoms (e.g. self-efficacy).
I read Canette's 2017 presentation where she states that conditional independence is not necessary with Gaussian variables and that we can include correlations among them.
Does this imply that we can disregard the assumption of local independence, or that we should explicitly relax the assumption for locally dependent variables within a class?
The latter seem to be suggested by others (e.g. by allowing error terms to covary within a class for these variables).
If the latter, how would one identify the locally dependent indicators in Stata, if possible?
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Best regards,
Martin
Related Posts with Latent profile analysis with continuous indicators and local independence
Right way to extract Confidence Intervals of coefficients of interaction termDear all, I was wondering about what would the right way to form a list or matrix or a variable (ei…
Parallel Trends Assumption in Difference-in-Differences (DiD)Hello guys, recently I´m doing some research on the risk behavior of banks during the low interest …
VAR or VECM- which one to use?If I have 4 variables in a model and I want to check for causality between the two variables say X a…
make loop for different deciles with eclass programDear all, I use user written command oaxaca_rif by Rios-Avila (Rios-Avila, F. 2020. Recentered infl…
Lags of RTAsHi, I have the RTA dummy that indicates if a pair of countries have a Regional Trade Agreement. My …
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Latent profile analysis with continuous indicators and local independence
Post a Comment