Dear Satalis,
I hope you are well. I would like to ask please regarding the problem of 'not concave' iteration. I have a dataset for 300 firms, one of the firms appears to be an outlier. When I excluded the outlier (i.e. to be only 299 firms) from the multinomial regression analysis (mlogit) the analysis iteration took a long time to perform the iteration and showed non-concavity in some iteration process. How to solve this problem please? Important to mention that when the outlier is not excluded the regression runs perfect but I got small value for the marginal effects results (for instance, 3.94E) for only one of the dependent variable estimation.
. mlogit App_status i.I_sec i.AF_LEG i.AF_AGE i.AF_SIZE i.I_loct2 i.I_expt2 i.AF_GRWT i.BO_GEN i.BO_CIT i.BO_AGE i.ow_Exper2 i.BO_FINT i.BO_EDU i.CR_LEN i.CR
> _BS1 i.CR_BS2 i.CR_BS3 i.CR_BS4 i.CR_BS5 i.CR_BS6 i.CR_BS7 i.CR_BS8 i.CR_SAT i.DE_ADS1 i.DE_ADS2 i.DE_ADS3 i.DE_ADS4 i.DE_ADS5 i.DE_ADS6 i.DE_ADS72 i.EI_BP i.EI_AUDFR
Iteration 0: log likelihood = -376.13767
Iteration 1: log likelihood = -240.52371
Iteration 2: log likelihood = -204.10375
Iteration 3: log likelihood = -190.49561
Iteration 4: log likelihood = -182.16412
Iteration 5: log likelihood = -174.29973
Iteration 6: log likelihood = -169.14731
Iteration 7: log likelihood = -167.60249
Iteration 8: log likelihood = -167.36518
Iteration 9: log likelihood = -167.30934
Iteration 10: log likelihood = -167.29729
Iteration 11: log likelihood = -167.29478
Iteration 12: log likelihood = -167.29422
Iteration 13: log likelihood = -167.29408
Iteration 14: log likelihood = -167.29405
Iteration 15: log likelihood = -167.29405 (not concave)
Iteration 16: log likelihood = -167.29405 (not concave)
Iteration 17: log likelihood = -167.29405 (not concave)
Iteration 18: log likelihood = -167.29405 (not concave)
Iteration 19: log likelihood = -167.29405 (not concave)
Iteration 20: log likelihood = -167.29405 (not concave)
Iteration 21: log likelihood = -167.29405 (not concave)
Iteration 22: log likelihood = -167.29405 (not concave)
Iteration 23: log likelihood = -167.29405 (not concave)
Iteration 24: log likelihood = -167.29405 (not concave)
Iteration 25: log likelihood = -167.29405 (not concave)
Iteration 26: log likelihood = -167.29405 (not concave)
Iteration 27: log likelihood = -167.29405 (not concave)
Iteration 28: log likelihood = -167.29405 (not concave)
Iteration 29: log likelihood = -167.29405 (not concave)
Iteration 30: log likelihood = -167.29405 (not concave)
Iteration 31: log likelihood = -167.29405 (not concave)
Iteration 32: log likelihood = -167.29405 (not concave)
Iteration 33: log likelihood = -167.29405 (not concave)
Iteration 34: log likelihood = -167.29405 (not concave)
Iteration 35: log likelihood = -167.29405 (not concave)
Iteration 36: log likelihood = -167.29405 (not concave)
Iteration 37: log likelihood = -167.29405 (not concave)
Iteration 38: log likelihood = -167.29405 (not concave)
Iteration 39: log likelihood = -167.29405 (not concave)
Iteration 40: log likelihood = -167.29405 (not concave)
Iteration 41: log likelihood = -167.29405 (not concave)
Iteration 42: log likelihood = -167.29405 (not concave)
Iteration 43: log likelihood = -167.29405 (not concave)
Iteration 44: log likelihood = -167.29405 (not concave)
Iteration 45: log likelihood = -167.29405 (not concave)
Iteration 46: log likelihood = -167.29405 (not concave)
Iteration 47: log likelihood = -167.29405 (not concave)
Iteration 48: log likelihood = -167.29405 (not concave)
Iteration 49: log likelihood = -167.29405 (not concave)
Iteration 50: log likelihood = -167.29405 (not concave)
Iteration 51: log likelihood = -167.29405 (not concave)
Iteration 52: log likelihood = -167.29405 (not concave)
Iteration 53: log likelihood = -167.29405 (not concave)
Iteration 54: log likelihood = -167.29405 (not concave)
Iteration 55: log likelihood = -167.29405 (not concave)
Iteration 56: log likelihood = -167.29405 (not concave)
Iteration 57: log likelihood = -167.29405 (not concave)
Iteration 58: log likelihood = -167.29405 (not concave)
--Break--
r(1);
Could you please advise on how to solve the problem of the non-concavity with mlogit analysis?
Appreciate your kind help and cooperation
Best regards,
Rabab
Related Posts with Not concave issue with multinomiallogit regression
Calculating standardized differences for comparisons between groupsI'm working with a very large dataset (NCDB), given the number of observations using chi2 to compare…
Difficulty with reproducibility of results and autocorrelation estimates using mixedDear Stata users, I have been running simulation studies investigating interrupted time series stud…
How can I conduct Fixed Effect test in a panel with heteroskedasticity and AR(1)? Note that my panel has N<TIf N>T then vce can do the trick. xtregar can solve the AR(1) but how can I take care of both whe…
Any way to recover a .do file after a crash?Stata crashed in the midst of a loop and I'm wondering if there is any way to recover the do file I …
Can I use xthybrid with short panels, i.e. T <N ?Dear Collegues: Can I use xthybrid with short panels, i.e. T <N ? …
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Not concave issue with multinomiallogit regression
Post a Comment