I am using panel data and trying to decide between the fixed and random effects models to use.
When I type "hausman fixed random", the results are not to reject the null hypothesis. Nonetheless, I have been warned instead do write the hausman test code considering random effects first: "hausman random fixed", and when I do this it results in a negative p-value error, even when adding the option sigmamore.
Why does it make such a difference which effects to consider first in the hausman test code? Also, what are my options trying to solve this problem of negative p-value?
Best,
João
Related Posts with Hausman Test producing different results
How to perform the pre-trend test in did_imputation?From reading the help file of did_imputation, I saw that pretrends(integer): if some value k>…
How to retrieve all the coefficient of independent variables of did_imputation package?Hi all, Normally, in a research paper, we need to present a table of coefficients of all independen…
Getting a different result w. do-file and copy-pastHello everyone, I am getting a different result when I run my do-file and when I copy-past my code …
How many pre-treatment periods we should test for paralell trend in the case of daily data?In a difference-in-differences setting, if we deal with yearly data, we normally test the parallel t…
Merging two datasetsHi all, Im new to STATA so I apologise if this is a silly question. I am trying to combine two data…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Hausman Test producing different results
Post a Comment