I am using panel data and trying to decide between the fixed and random effects models to use.
When I type "hausman fixed random", the results are not to reject the null hypothesis. Nonetheless, I have been warned instead do write the hausman test code considering random effects first: "hausman random fixed", and when I do this it results in a negative p-value error, even when adding the option sigmamore.
Why does it make such a difference which effects to consider first in the hausman test code? Also, what are my options trying to solve this problem of negative p-value?
Best,
João
Related Posts with Hausman Test producing different results
Can you use a principal component analysis and a heckman test together?For my master thesis I am facing some issues and I would appreciate some advice. I use Stata 16 for …
plotting confidence intervals of a regression line in panel dataDear all, I am a beginner in Stata and I am trying to find out how to plot confidence intervals of a…
Multinomial ;ogistic regressionTwo questions regarding mlogit: Can the RRR be equated to an odds ratio How exactly do you interpre…
Using seemingly unrelated estimation with Driscol-Kraay standard errors I am trying to run suest for two regressions estimated with Driscoll-Kraay standard errors using th…
Creating a new variableHello Statalist, I think I overthinking a rather simple problem with creating a new variable and I …
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Hausman Test producing different results
Post a Comment