I am using panel data and trying to decide between the fixed and random effects models to use.
When I type "hausman fixed random", the results are not to reject the null hypothesis. Nonetheless, I have been warned instead do write the hausman test code considering random effects first: "hausman random fixed", and when I do this it results in a negative p-value error, even when adding the option sigmamore.
Why does it make such a difference which effects to consider first in the hausman test code? Also, what are my options trying to solve this problem of negative p-value?
Best,
João
Related Posts with Hausman Test producing different results
difference in results between including an interaction with categorical variable v. subgroup analysis Hi all! I’m running multinomial logit models with gender as an outcome. Goal: look at gender over t…
Is there any way we could permanently set the graphregion(fcolor(white))?I like white plotting background. So, to make it white, I have to set the graph region color option …
GamHello I am not able to get GAM to work anyone has advice on how to download GAM? Thank you …
Picking initial log of value added per worker per country in their initial yearHi, I am trying to figure it out how to set up Stata to pick the first log of real value added per …
[STATA 17] Problem with using newly installed commandHello Stata people, I hope everything is fine with you!! I recently purchased a STATA version 17 …
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Hausman Test producing different results
Post a Comment