I got the following result after running an extreme bound analysis.
gfc, gfcf, infl, popgr, to, tot, llock are the variables that appear in all the regressions.
fdini is the variable of interest.
polity2, cor, ge, ps, rq, rl, va are other potential control variables.
gdppcgr is the dependent variable.
Can someone please help me in interpreting the following result?
I have gone through papers that report EBA results; but those result tables are different from the output that Stata gives. Thus I am unable to make much sense of the output.
For example: 1. The five columns in front of each combination of z variables.
2. The table at the end
3. Additionally, if someone can please explain the difference between le() and the 0.95 CI mentioned in the last table.
Code:
eba gdppcgr fdini polity2 cor ge ps rq rl va, x(gfc gfcf infl popgr to tot llock) detail type(3) le(0.15) z1 z2 z3 1 4.6472645 .00320803 .15240717 .90371552 z1 z2 z4 1 3.0548062 -.00257979 -.12230341 .922524 z1 z2 z5 1 3.919754 .00126325 .06002498 .96183271 z1 z2 z6 1 6.1878181 -.00076388 -.03625275 .97693089 z1 z2 z7 1 3.6349709 -.00070261 -.03365616 .97858191 z1 z3 z4 1 2.3002324 .00368973 .17499878 .88970914 z1 z3 z5 1 5.5216174 .00479687 .22801675 .85728006 z1 z3 z6 1 5.6181717 .00470837 .22387925 .85978612 z1 z3 z7 1 3.1569164 .00162142 .07706948 .95103284 z1 z4 z5 1 2.0866983 .0030853 .14589109 .90777349 z1 z4 z6 1 3.1105747 .00127314 .06022497 .96170584 z1 z4 z7 1 2.2323534 -.00442695 -.21014918 .86813372 z1 z5 z6 1 4.5545945 .00357673 .1696774 .89299911 z1 z5 z7 1 2.7914491 -.0006536 -.0310681 .98022779 z1 z6 z7 1 3.8547575 -.00260347 -.12367798 .92166196 z2 z3 z4 1 4.8191953 .00221314 .10758012 .93177476 z2 z3 z5 1 6.8219852 .00381441 .18573088 .88309218 z2 z3 z6 1 7.0903535 .00264684 .12899079 .91833287 z2 z3 z7 1 4.6707268 .00344555 .16758468 .89429454 z2 z4 z5 1 4.038815 .00040825 .01985424 .98736206 z2 z4 z6 1 6.0524855 -.00058906 -.0286741 .9817505 z2 z4 z7 1 3.2560699 -.00147631 -.07204387 .95421455 z2 z5 z6 1 7.1446962 .00091743 .04468834 .97156943 z2 z5 z7 1 3.8615916 .00093359 .04548912 .97106068 z2 z6 z7 1 6.8034697 -.00276362 -.13459017 .91482905 z3 z4 z5 1 5.7203054 .00533139 .25922867 .8385243 z3 z4 z6 1 7.5384178 .00553112 .2688928 .83277299 z3 z4 z7 1 3.0974302 .00289881 .14055224 .91110399 z3 z5 z6 1 7.2717772 .006164 .30013074 .81437648 z3 z5 z7 1 5.7568231 .00437667 .21266793 .86659884 z3 z6 z7 1 7.1319551 .00368098 .17891625 .88729092 z4 z5 z6 1 6.7978168 .00376513 .18257896 .88503294 z4 z5 z7 1 2.9073579 .00042755 .02068883 .98683096 z4 z6 z7 1 4.8576789 -.0002627 -.01272858 .99189717 z5 z6 z7 1 6.1259589 .00178423 .0864996 .94506937 Result of EBA on fdini at .15 confidence level and maximum VIF = 10000 Dvar = gdppcgr X = [gfc gfcf infl popgr to tot llock] Z = [polity2 cor ge ps rq rl va] beta t p-val .95 C.I. VIF Zs -----|---------|---------|--------|---------|---------|----------------------- min 0.0053 0.2592 0.8385 -0.2560 0.2667 5.72 [z3 z4 z5] Max 0.0062 0.3001 0.8144 -0.2548 0.2671 7.27 [z3 z5 z6] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ A total of 35 combinations of 3 regressors from the Z(nx7) vector were used. .
Aman
Stata 14.0
0 Response to Extreme Bound Analysis Results Interpretation
Post a Comment