Dear all,
I have a question regarding whether I should log-transform my dependent variable or not. I know that there are a lot of threads regarding this topic but I haven´t found a good answer for my case yet. I also posted a similar question on CrossValidated but didn´t get a response there. Thank you very much for considering my case!
I know that if my dependent variable is in log I can interpret the coefficient as a percentage change. However, in my case my dependent variables are ratios such as workers per firm or output per firm. What would the interpretation be if I log these variables (i.e. log(workers/firm))? My independent variable is a dummy for program participation and I am using a DID model. So in effect I am wondering whether dummy = 1 would still be interpreted as being correlated with a change in my dependent variable by approximately 100*beta percent?
Again, thank you very much for your help!
All the best
Leon
Related Posts with Log Transformation of Ratios Interpretation
Fama&MacBeth: xtfmb function. Time-fixed effectsHello statalisters, My case is that of an unbalanced panel data composed by 25,714 companies ("cusi…
What estimation methods can endogenicity, heteroskedasticity, autocorrelation and fixed effects be solved without using GMM?Hello netizens of Stata forum. I have a panel of 13 countries and 8 years. I tried with the GMM but …
Constraint function in optimize()Hello, I'm currently facing the following problem: I'm trying to minimize the variance of a portfol…
Ramsey Reset Test for single years vs whole data periodHi, I am running OLS regressions, firstly for 3 separate years (2006, 2010 and then 2015) and then …
Keeping mutliple observationsHello, I am currently working with a complete dataset with all firms in a country. However, I only …
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Log Transformation of Ratios Interpretation
Post a Comment