Hello
I am using the South African National Income Dynamics Survey (NIDS) panelset (waves 1 to 5).
I have a binary variable 'access' which = 1 if the household has access to piped water and 0 otherwise. I am assessing whether access to piped water will affect education outcomes of school-going children who belong to the African subpopulation by exploiting the panel nature of the dataset and using a fixed effect regression. From what i understand, the fixed effect looks at the variation within individuals to account for any time-invariant factors (such as ability, culture etc.).
I get a statistically significant coefficient in the right direction (ie positive - saying that access to piped water increases education years) - however, when i include age and age2, the effect is reversed and it is no longer significant. The age variable, however, is very significant and accounts for a one-for-one effect on schooling. My thoughts are that age and schooling are too correlated and i would thus like to omit it. I am concerned as to how i could reason this. Could anyone assist me in this?
Regards
Sophie Gebers
Related Posts with Omission of age in fixed effect regression
Test for endogeneity of the independent variable and exogeneity of my instruments (fixed effect model) - By hand and Postestimation tools?Hi everyone, I am studying the impact of Board independence on firm performance. Board independence…
Reading fixed-format text files into STATAHi everyone, I want to read multiple fixed format-text files for multiple years into Stata. I have …
Loop for xtline with graph combine Stata codeDear all, I want to plot calories for the each panel id over the year. Here I have written the loop …
Putdocx decimal issueHello all: I wanted to get the median, and IQR numbers to show only 1 decimal but I am seeing 10. Al…
Speed Up StataHello How we can speed up the Stata calculations please …
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Omission of age in fixed effect regression
Post a Comment