Hello
I am using the South African National Income Dynamics Survey (NIDS) panelset (waves 1 to 5).
I have a binary variable 'access' which = 1 if the household has access to piped water and 0 otherwise. I am assessing whether access to piped water will affect education outcomes of school-going children who belong to the African subpopulation by exploiting the panel nature of the dataset and using a fixed effect regression. From what i understand, the fixed effect looks at the variation within individuals to account for any time-invariant factors (such as ability, culture etc.).
I get a statistically significant coefficient in the right direction (ie positive - saying that access to piped water increases education years) - however, when i include age and age2, the effect is reversed and it is no longer significant. The age variable, however, is very significant and accounts for a one-for-one effect on schooling. My thoughts are that age and schooling are too correlated and i would thus like to omit it. I am concerned as to how i could reason this. Could anyone assist me in this?
Regards
Sophie Gebers
Related Posts with Omission of age in fixed effect regression
Need help with the option of the bar graphHi, I want to draw a bar graph for the industries which have more than 100 firms, however, I do not…
graph bar with error barsHi everyone, I am beginning with STATA and I am creating a graph bar but I can't find how to add er…
About FamaMacbeth RegressionHello everyone, I am a graduate student from Japan.New guy here.This is my first post, thank you for…
Aggregating Dummy Variables EfficientlyHi Statalist, I very much appreciate your help with my question. I have hundreds of dummy variable…
Predicting individual-level slopes and intercepts after running mixed-effects modelsHi All I'm running two linear spline mixed-effects models (growth curve analysis) looking at MH and…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Omission of age in fixed effect regression
Post a Comment