Dear all,
I want to ask you about results of fixed effect and CCEP/CCEMG.
I regressed my variables using FE two way (with command xtreg) and found that my variable of interest and control variables significant.
However, I did the test of cross-sectional dependence for every variable and found them to be cross-sectional dependent.
For that reason, I decided to regress again using CCEP and CCEMG. However, I ended up with all my variables become insignificant.
Can someone help me if it's actually normal?
Thanks a lot
Related Posts with regressions with Fixed Effect and CCEMG/CCEP give different results
Problem with lpolyci graph using Stata 15 vs 17Hi everybody! I am using Stata 17. While running the code below: HTML Code: sysuse auto, clear …
Help!! Data cleaning, creating new variables with observations based on complicated conditionsPlease help me with cleaning this data: below is my data from excel file and I have 1000s of rows …
xtabond2: interpretation of Arellano-Bond test using forward orthogonal deviationsI've been trying to understand the interpretation of the Arellano-Bond test when using FOD for syste…
How to identify that random effect linear model is required over fixed effect linear model?I'm trying to predict a continuous variable using multiple linear regression model including various…
Renaming variables in loopHello all, I'm working with a dataset which has variables with counters as follows: payment_1, paym…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to regressions with Fixed Effect and CCEMG/CCEP give different results
Post a Comment