Hello Stata users,
I am performing a cosinor analysis on seasonal iodine dispersion. To do this, I have appended 2 survey data sets, with two different probability weights totaling about 3000 observations. I understand that given missing data, etc., the final regression will not contain ~3000 observations, but this number changes significantly when I include the probability weights. When I use one, I get an output with 888 observations, and when I use the other, my output suddenly has close to 2000.
My question here is how do I justify the use of one pweight over the other? Is there a way to include both in my regression?
Thank you for your time!
-Hannah
Related Posts with Question about probability weights and number of observations
Multi-level model with mediator and index variable from survey-level dataHi. I am attempting to perform a regression on a combined micro (individual level data from survey …
How to find a Conditional Greatest Date based on a subject identifier?Hello Forum Members, I hope you can help with this conditional date finding problem. I have a datab…
Creating new variables repeatedlyDear Statalisters, I have 1696 variables for which there daily values available for a period of 16 …
basis of calculation increase progressivelyDear Stata users, I want to forecast demand of labor from 2019 to 2050. The basic formula is Et = E…
Problem frames: use identical variables with different observations of two framesHello everyone I'm trying to calculate the average price-to-book ratio of dividend-paying companies…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Question about probability weights and number of observations
Post a Comment