Hello,
I run regression with probit and get the table of average marginal effects. I am wondering how can I interpret the quantitative impacts of ratio (bounded) explanatory variables. For example, I have an independent variable: share of income on housing (X1) which is between 0 and 1, and its APE is 0.07 . The dependent variable is the probability of investment.
=> An increase in X1 by 1 unit leads to an increase in the average probability of investment by 7 percentage points. However, I find it odd to say that X1 increase by 1 unit as its value is bounded between 0 and 1. Do you think it is acceptable to interpret the results as above or what is a better way to interpret the results pls?
Thank you very much!
Related Posts with Interpreting impacts of ratio (bounded) explanatory variables
mlogit alternativesDear Statalists, I have 4 alternatives ( let's say A B C and D ). I thought earlier a multinomial l…
Sample weights to twoway line graphDear all, I am trying to plot net transfers by groups in € (y-axis) against age (x-axis) in one gra…
variable _mi_miss not foundI am attempting to import imputed data into a data set using the command, mi import wide. It results…
Order coefficients in bycoefs coefplotHello, I have created this coefplot with the "bycoefs" option. I am happy with it, but I would like…
Rename variables with labels when labels are multiple words?Background/big problem I have about 60 large data sets, each a different round of a repeated survey…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Interpreting impacts of ratio (bounded) explanatory variables
Post a Comment