I am trying to translate the following output to a table in a word document. However, I am a bit unsure about how to correctly interpret the output. Primarily when looking at the constant.
I am currently running two tables: one with a baseline of 4 (Green/ecologist parties) and one with 2 (Communist/socialist parties). The dependent variable is political success. In both tables, the output is exponentiated. However, I obviously still want to include both families. How do I do this correctly? Since the output from both tables are vastly different from one another
Table 1 (Green/ecologist parties as baseline)
success | Odds Ratio | Std. Err. | z | P>z | [95% Conf. | Interval] |
party_family | ||||||
Christian democracy | 2.429069 | .0834748 | 25.83 | 0.000 | 2.27085 | 2.598312 |
Communist/Socialist | .7689889 | .026734 | -7.56 | 0.000 | .7183365 | .8232128 |
Conservative | 1.256617 | .0455363 | 6.30 | 0.000 | 1.170463 | 1.349112 |
Liberal | 1.798223 | .060369 | 17.48 | 0.000 | 1.68371 | 1.920523 |
Right-wing | 2.589988 | .1875777 | 13.14 | 0.000 | 2.247244 | 2.985007 |
Social democracy | 2.145219 | .1034633 | 15.83 | 0.000 | 1.951724 | 2.357897 |
Special issue | .5662629 | .0364536 | -8.83 | 0.000 | .4991389 | .6424137 |
cabinetnumb | .9163369 | .0041901 | -19.11 | 0.000 | .9081612 | .9245862 |
seats | .9893395 | .00136 | -7.80 | 0.000 | .9866775 | .9920088 |
elecsuccess | 1.239797 | .0307061 | 8.68 | 0.000 | 1.181052 | 1.301465 |
governing | 10.3113 | .3449301 | 69.75 | 0.000 | 9.656935 | 11.01001 |
_cons | .8578049 | .0282499 | -4.66 | 0.000 | .8041853 | .9149996 |
success | Odds Ratio | Std. Err. | z | P>z | [95% Conf. | Interval] |
party_family | ||||||
Christian democracy | 3.158783 | .0983181 | 36.95 | 0.000 | 2.971843 | 3.357482 |
Conservative | 1.634116 | .0590701 | 13.59 | 0.000 | 1.522347 | 1.754091 |
Green/Ecologist | 1.300409 | .0452088 | 7.56 | 0.000 | 1.214753 | 1.392105 |
Liberal | 2.338425 | .0749027 | 26.52 | 0.000 | 2.196131 | 2.489938 |
Right-wing | 3.368044 | .2450815 | 16.69 | 0.000 | 2.920375 | 3.884337 |
Social democracy | 2.789661 | .1146532 | 24.96 | 0.000 | 2.573758 | 3.023676 |
Special issue | .7363734 | .0479969 | -4.69 | 0.000 | .6480622 | .8367188 |
cabinetnumb | .9163369 | .0041901 | -19.11 | 0.000 | .9081612 | .9245862 |
seats | .9893395 | .00136 | -7.80 | 0.000 | .9866775 | .9920088 |
elecsuccess | 1.239797 | .0307061 | 8.68 | 0.000 | 1.181052 | 1.301465 |
governing | 10.3113 | .3449301 | 69.75 | 0.000 | 9.656935 | 11.01001 |
_cons | .6596424 | .0258202 | -10.63 | 0.000 | .6109283 | .7122409 |
0 Response to What's the correct way of interpreting the (exponentiated) log odds?
Post a Comment