Hi all,
Could you please help in interpreting the below result of the link test (attached). Also, I could not apply the Ramsey RESET test after the logit. Therefore, I would like to ask please, is it important to apply the RESET test with linktest?
and if so? How I can do it with logit regression in Stata software?
Array
. linktest, nolog
Logistic regression
Number of obs = 300
LR chi2(2) = 191
Prob > chi2 = 0.00
Pseudo R2 = 0.4964
Log likelihood = -97.17107
appl_bnk coefficient P>z
_hat 1.012059 0.000
_hatsq 0.0124162 0.806
_cons -0.0250553 0.905
This is my interpretation for the linktest result, please correct me
the test fails to reject the null hypothesis H0 where it indicates no misspecification errors exist, no need to include or omit variable and the predicted Yhat is very identical to the real Y dependent variable values; hence, the model specification is correct.
Many thanks for giving your concern
Best regards,
Rabab
Related Posts with linktest interpretation
Identifying and flagging matchesI have a large dataset with rows that include a unique identifier 'id' and a unique time variable ca…
Issue with converting date in dd.mm.yy format to dd/mm/yyyyI have a historical dataset with teenagers' birthday in the format of dd.mm.yy, while they were all …
Moving average invalid syntaxHi all, I'm creating my own moving average code since I only want the top four of the previous seve…
SEM builder with Random InterceptsHello everyone! I am trying to build a model with random intercepts with the SEM builder. In my data…
-codebook, problems- with problems indicating incompletely labeled vars-codebook, problems- can indicate if variables are incompletely labeled. However, it also reports va…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to linktest interpretation
Post a Comment