I'm having a hard time trying to interpret the results of a negative binomial regression (xtnbreg) where the independent variable is log transformed (natural). Here it is L_grant_stockoptions.
I'm hesitating between two interpretations.
-A 1% change in L_grant_stockoptions leads to a -0.017 in log count of Acquisitions.
OR
-A 1% change in L_grant_stockoptions leads to a -0.017/100 change in Acquisitions unit.
Any help is appreciated
Code:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Acquisitions | Coef. Std. Err. z P>|z| [95% Conf. Interval] ---------------------+---------------------------------------------------------------- L_Grant_stockoptions | -.0173741 .0098044 -1.77 0.076 -.0365904 .0018422 L_firm_size | .2318761 .0536278 4.32 0.000 .1267676 .3369847 L_stock_ownership | .0799546 .0347109 2.30 0.021 .0119224 .1479867 L_other_comp | .0677387 .0455417 1.49 0.137 -.0215213 .1569987 CEO_age | -.017233 .0115617 -1.49 0.136 -.0398936 .0054276 CEO_gender | 1.481501 .874864 1.69 0.090 -.2332005 3.196203 CEO_tenure | .0093143 .0106577 0.87 0.382 -.0115745 .0302031 Company | .0003142 .0019597 0.16 0.873 -.0035268 .0041552 _cons | -5.340459 1.612631 -3.31 0.001 -8.501157 -2.179761 ---------------------+---------------------------------------------------------------- /ln_r | 2.452073 .3523153 1.761548 3.142599 /ln_s | .3758031 .188786 .0057893 .745817 ---------------------+---------------------------------------------------------------- r | 11.6124 4.091227 5.821442 23.16399 s | 1.45616 .2749028 1.005806 2.108163 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 Response to Interpreting negative binomial coefficient with log IV
Post a Comment