Hi all,
I have a set of variables that have missing values, which I am attempting to impute using MICE. As seems common, it's difficult to get the model to run, particularly because some mlogit models are slow to converge even with the augment option. We've considered a two-step procedure, where in the first step we run mi impute on a subset of variables (say, X1) with missing data, and in the second step we impute values for a second set (X2), using X1 as right had side variables. Intuitively this seems wrong to me, because the X1 values would be treated as known in the second model, but we're wondering if the "add" option would appropriately account for this by, for example, using the initial imputed data sets as a starting place.
Is it valid to impute values for X1 and then use those as right hand side variables in a second imputation? Forgive me if I've missed this in the generally thorough MI documentation. I should also say that I'm far from an MI expert so forgive as well my ignorance on the topic!
Best,
Paul
Related Posts with Clarifying question about MI impute
Long Data Format: Creating a New Variable with Values Conditional on Combination of Values of Other Variables Across Many ObservationsHello! I am stuck not knowing how to create a variable I need based on my current data. I have a l…
Negative lower confidence interval boundary for variance with nlcom after a multilevel logistic regressionHello, I am conducting a multilevel logistic regression to identify determinants of the availabilit…
How to graph difference in means between model 1 and model 2Hi Statalist, I will appreciate help with this problem. First, here is my data: Code: * Example g…
Joint modelling of binary longitudinal outcomes in using random effects approachHi everyone, I would like to jointly model two binary repeated outcomes in STATA using the random ef…
total dose per day with multiple dates and times Code: * Example generated by -dataex-. To install: ssc install dataex clear input int(date_daily_3…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Clarifying question about MI impute
Post a Comment