Hi all,
I have a set of variables that have missing values, which I am attempting to impute using MICE. As seems common, it's difficult to get the model to run, particularly because some mlogit models are slow to converge even with the augment option. We've considered a two-step procedure, where in the first step we run mi impute on a subset of variables (say, X1) with missing data, and in the second step we impute values for a second set (X2), using X1 as right had side variables. Intuitively this seems wrong to me, because the X1 values would be treated as known in the second model, but we're wondering if the "add" option would appropriately account for this by, for example, using the initial imputed data sets as a starting place.
Is it valid to impute values for X1 and then use those as right hand side variables in a second imputation? Forgive me if I've missed this in the generally thorough MI documentation. I should also say that I'm far from an MI expert so forgive as well my ignorance on the topic!
Best,
Paul
Related Posts with Clarifying question about MI impute
How to test goodness of fit in multinomial logistic regression having used the subpop rather than sub sample optionoptionHow do I test the goodness of fit for multinomial logistic regression, having used the subpop option…
Generate var3 for if var1>var2I am trying to make a new variable that shows if people have a higher value in one variable than ano…
merge vars do not uniquely identify observations in master data - but no duplicates foundI am struggling to perform a 1:m merge on two merge variables that are both string variables. When I…
Help - Create Variable Indicating Percent who Agree or Strongly Agree by DepartmentHi, All, I have survey data with responses from individuals (n = 1077, some missing data), and thos…
Panel Data: xttest2 errorHi, I am running a long panel (t=15, N=8), 8 countries and 15 years. after running for fe I ran the…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Clarifying question about MI impute
Post a Comment