I am testing whether financial access is correlated with the education of young individuals using a longitudinal panel.
Among the controls I am using there is parents' education that is a determinant of child's education. Nevertheless, there are a lot of missing, thus adding it I drastically reduce my sample but with still a significant number of observations (more or less from 11,000 to 1,700). To remove it would increase the sample and gives me more significant results. I also include household income as control, that in part captures the information relative to parents' education since they are partially correlated.
My question is whether is better to keep the control losing most of the sample or to remove it with the risk of omitted variable bias.
Related Posts with Bigger sample or omitted variable bias?
Referring to local macros using unabHello statalisters, I have 227 variables that are grouped by common prefixes. I am trying to use th…
Multiple McNemar TestHello all, I am doing 10 McNemar test for comparing matched data. Example: mcci 192 0 1 0 1. Just li…
Data manipulation - your experience with mergingHi I’m working with very large datasets - ones that contain for 1mill observations with 20+ variable…
matrix recursive elementHi, I want to run this code Code: local filas = 300 local columnas = 1 matrix A = J(`filas',`colum…
How to forecast counterfactual in ARIMAI am wondering if anyone could suggest codes on how to forecast the counterfactuals in an ARIMA mode…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Bigger sample or omitted variable bias?
Post a Comment