Hello guys, I am using MICE approach. I have some continuous variables (e.g., income) and categorical variables (e.g., race as dichotomous) and dependent variables like cogtest 1, cogtest2. For moderation, I need to use several interaction terms. Most of the independent and all dependent variables have missing values except 2 independent variables gender and age . I am familiar with treating interaction terms as 'just another variable' approach. i also know about them keeping them as passive. Now the question is: should I include them as new variables (e.g., after generating one (incrace= income X race) ), If I do should it be REGRESS or LOGIT? Should it be something like MI Imputed Chained (Regress) income incrace cogtest1 cogtest2 (logit) race= Gender Age, add (10)...? It doesnt make much sense as race has not been imputed yet. Should I have 2 commands then, the first one without interaction terms and the second equation command include all the interaction terms? or should I just include them as passive? It might sound silly but I am pretty confused as I am just learning.
Related Posts with MI imputed chained interaction terms
Why Mundlak and Fixed effect regression coefficient are not exactly sameDear Statalist, I have any issue regarding comparing the fixed-effect model and mundlak effect in c…
logistic function (discounting models): error r(430) convergence not achievedHi, I use the following commands (logistic function) and Stata indicates "error r(430) convergence …
Using a loop to append multiple waves of dataI want to create a loop to append multiple waves of panel data. Most vars appear in each wave, three…
bysort command while regressingI have 2 variables, investment and cash flow. I also generated a dummy variable called age, which ha…
Predict with oprobit: cross-section by fyearHi all, I need to estimate equation (below) via ordered probit and cross-sectionally by fyear. And …
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to MI imputed chained interaction terms
Post a Comment