Hello guys, I am using MICE approach. I have some continuous variables (e.g., income) and categorical variables (e.g., race as dichotomous) and dependent variables like cogtest 1, cogtest2. For moderation, I need to use several interaction terms. Most of the independent and all dependent variables have missing values except 2 independent variables gender and age . I am familiar with treating interaction terms as 'just another variable' approach. i also know about them keeping them as passive. Now the question is: should I include them as new variables (e.g., after generating one (incrace= income X race) ), If I do should it be REGRESS or LOGIT? Should it be something like MI Imputed Chained (Regress) income incrace cogtest1 cogtest2 (logit) race= Gender Age, add (10)...? It doesnt make much sense as race has not been imputed yet. Should I have 2 commands then, the first one without interaction terms and the second equation command include all the interaction terms? or should I just include them as passive? It might sound silly but I am pretty confused as I am just learning.
Related Posts with MI imputed chained interaction terms
Question about time series data with multiple factorsI am trying to format my data to allow me to designate it as time series and use the lag and lead op…
Code to be able identify treated-control firm(s) groups for matched dataHi I have a matched treated-control firm-year panel dataset which I matched on different variables …
Interrupted time series with multiple treatment periodsI am working on a sugar tax evaluation, using an interrupted time series model that accounts for two…
ols vs logistic regressionGood evening ladies and gents May I ask for your expertise in choosing the above. I want to test th…
Paired t-test for unmatched subjects impossible to compute?I know that this is Stata Forum (not SPSS)! But I came across a very interesting discussion that may…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to MI imputed chained interaction terms
Post a Comment