I'm running a 4-equation model (2 x Heckman selection model) with CMP and I want to add random intercepts (maybe later also random slopes). Without any random effects, the model runs fast (4 hours for a N = 700,000 dataset and ~ 10 predictors per equation). I'm running the model on a Linux server and it consumes at maximum 2GB of RAM.
When I start adding a random intercept (the data belongs to 17,000 individuals) to each of the four equations, after a few minutes, Stata consumes more than 500GB of RAM (which is the maximum I get allocate to the job) and it aborts the estimation.
I've tried adding random intercepts to only two out of the four equations, then the model consumes at maximum 22GB of RAM but has not finished yet after 3.5 days.
I'm wondering why adding the random intercepts has such an enormous effect on the computational effort of the model.
Any ideas what's going on?
Related Posts with Adding random intercepts in CMP slows down estimation a lot and makes required RAM exceed 500GB
Non stopping iterations problem with teffects ipwraHi all, I am trying for the first time to run my difference-in-difference model with inverse propen…
"Hessian has become unstable or asymmetric" error in Panel ARDL modelDear All, I try to run panel ARDL model to apply these variables: inflation, capacity utilisation, c…
Seperating Dataset or NotDear Users, I have a panel data ranging from 2001 to 2010. For comparative purposes, I want to use …
Poisson not concaveDear forum, May I ask what it is that causes a Poisson model to not converge? I have a panel dat…
Rolling sdHi Statalist, I am a frequent reader of Statalist, I am using Stata 15.1. I am trying to replicate…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Adding random intercepts in CMP slows down estimation a lot and makes required RAM exceed 500GB
Post a Comment