Hello to everyone, I am searching in terms of the effect of the uncertainty on the saving and in one part of my robustness check I want to do a Xtabond2 . I read the construction of doing xtabond2 from David Roodman . but I become confused. I have a panel data from 1996 to 2017. and :
saving (i,t)= b0+b1saving (i,t-1)+b2 uncertainty (i,t-1)+ b3 X(i,t-1) +vt + vi+ e(i,t)
and x(i,t-1) is a vector of controls, which in the baseline model includes only human capital and per capita income.
in the Xtabond2 I want to address a solution to the possible endogeneity problem between economic uncertainty and the saving by instrumenting them with suitable lagged variables. To obtain efficient findings in the System GMM estimations, I need evidence for the validity of the first-order autocorrelation in the residuals, but second-order autocorrelation must be rejected. Then We run the Sargan test to avoid possible over-identification problems.
the more I read the more I become confused to how to do this.
Thank you very much in advance.
Regards,
Related Posts with Xtabond2 command system GMM.
the proper regressionplease I want to know which is the proper regression for my panel data while there is only heteroske…
Fixed Effect Model Insignificant p-valuesHi Satalist Users, I currently working on an applied project for my BSc.I am trying to estimate the…
metan for mean differences?Hello, I am conducting a systematic review and the majority of studies present their results as mea…
ivreg2 gmm: Montiel Olea and Pflueger testHi, I am using ivreg2 gmm specification with one endogenous regression and multiple instrument and c…
Copy values from one variable to other cases in same groupDear Statalist, I'm using version 14.2 for windows. I have the following dataset (short example, th…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Xtabond2 command system GMM.
Post a Comment