Hello everyone,
I am running an analysis to see if serum cholesterol together with sex, DBP, and Age are associated with number of heart attacks. I started off by checking for the assumption of (mean=variance) and noticed that its better to work with negative binomial regression due to overdispersion.
I went on to fit the model and zero inflated negative binomial regression turned out to be the best model I could work with.
Compared the -2LL and noticed the full model was better than the reduced model. However am stuck on how to proceed to the next step of dropping all insignificant interaction terms, which p-values to consider in the model and how i can fit my model.
Kindly help me out.
Thanks
Related Posts with Zero inflated negative binomial regression vs negative binomial regression
Problem with the Stata GraphHey guys, I'm quit new to Stata and want to give out a graph in Stata. I have import and export Dat…
Change in a variable when we have pooled cross-sectionsHello, How can we calculate the change in a variable when its values for two consecutive years are …
How to write a command for nultiple condition with a character variable?Hi all, in my study, I want to study the subsample without observations from some countries without …
Drawing a graph with insignificant*coefficient!Hi, Can we draw a graph when some of our regression coefficients show up as insignificant? Specific…
panel unit root test fixed effect random effect1. In what bases of Unit root test result I can go for fixed and random effect modelling? 2. Can I g…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Zero inflated negative binomial regression vs negative binomial regression
Post a Comment