This table provides results of the analysis of the role of tax avoidance on returns. The dependent variables are Cumulative abnormal returns.
The authors state: "Economically, a 1-standard-deviation increase in tax avoidance is associated with a 0.75% (=26.2%*2.859%) more negative firm value response in Column 1".
My question is where is "26.2%" coming from? The figures in parentheses are t -statistics, and they do not report standard deviation but I assume -2.859 corresponds to one standard deviation in tax avoidance ("Tax variable"). Then why do the authors multiply the coefficient -2.859 by "26.2%"???
I'd really appreciate any help in interpreting this result.
Paper: The Value of Offshore Secrets: Evidence from the Panama Papers
Related Posts with Interpreting results: 1-standard-deviation increase in an explanatory variable
Identify the age-period-cohort effectDear friends, I tried to apply the command of ''apcd''. The code is, Code: use "http://www.louisc…
First Difference vs. Fixed Effects with multiple-year dataHello, I'm trying to run FD and FE on my dataset. The results are supposed to be the same but someh…
Generating a dummy variable for an entire household based on a individual labour market characteristicHey there I am using cross-sectional for South Africa that that includes household(hhid) and indivi…
Mixed model , percentage changeI have a mixed effect model with unequal repeated measures rangr from time 1 to time 20. All subject…
Spelling of decompositionDear Stata uers, My question is not related to statistics. My native language is not English, there…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Interpreting results: 1-standard-deviation increase in an explanatory variable
Post a Comment