This table provides results of the analysis of the role of tax avoidance on returns. The dependent variables are Cumulative abnormal returns.
The authors state: "Economically, a 1-standard-deviation increase in tax avoidance is associated with a 0.75% (=26.2%*2.859%) more negative firm value response in Column 1".
My question is where is "26.2%" coming from? The figures in parentheses are t -statistics, and they do not report standard deviation but I assume -2.859 corresponds to one standard deviation in tax avoidance ("Tax variable"). Then why do the authors multiply the coefficient -2.859 by "26.2%"???
I'd really appreciate any help in interpreting this result.
Paper: The Value of Offshore Secrets: Evidence from the Panama Papers
Related Posts with Interpreting results: 1-standard-deviation increase in an explanatory variable
tostring does not return correct valuesDear Statalisters, I've imported a large .txt file to Stata using import delimited. The file has a …
error message when using XtgraphHello, I am currently having some issues using xtgraph that I haven't experienced before. When I us…
Create several histograms same pictureHello, I would like to have several histograms in the same picture with the answers (inapplicable, …
Dealing with Product wise and Year wise firm dataI am working on a data that consists the following variables - firms, years and the product codes of…
Bootstrapping for logistic regression on imbalanced dataHi there, I've googled quite a bit but haven't quite figured out how to implement this in STATA. I …
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Interpreting results: 1-standard-deviation increase in an explanatory variable
Post a Comment