This table provides results of the analysis of the role of tax avoidance on returns. The dependent variables are Cumulative abnormal returns.
The authors state: "Economically, a 1-standard-deviation increase in tax avoidance is associated with a 0.75% (=26.2%*2.859%) more negative firm value response in Column 1".
My question is where is "26.2%" coming from? The figures in parentheses are t -statistics, and they do not report standard deviation but I assume -2.859 corresponds to one standard deviation in tax avoidance ("Tax variable"). Then why do the authors multiply the coefficient -2.859 by "26.2%"???
I'd really appreciate any help in interpreting this result.
Paper: The Value of Offshore Secrets: Evidence from the Panama Papers
Related Posts with Interpreting results: 1-standard-deviation increase in an explanatory variable
Subsetting data using labelsHi, I have 15 big data sets where I want to keep only a few variables and I want to do the same to …
ring setting of legend option and scheme modifiedDear Stata users, I like placing the legend inside the plot, so I modify scheme s2color as follows:…
Synth_runner: Interpret the statistical outcome and general questions [Stata]Hello together, I am started to work with stata and synth_runner package. I try to figure out differ…
Error installing markstatI am consistently receiving the following error when I attempt to install markstat. I already instal…
Question about Survival Analysis (Discrete hazard proportional odd)Dear statalist, First of all, I would like to thank you all for the valuable information you are pro…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Interpreting results: 1-standard-deviation increase in an explanatory variable
Post a Comment