I'm trying to understand the impact of waiting time at intersection on pedestrian signal violation behaviour. I have two variables, one is gender and other is age. I used a chi-square test of independence and observed gender and age, both are significantly associated with crossing behaviour (waited/violated). But when I fit a survival analysis model both with COX and Accelerated Failure Time, the gender and age both comes out to be insignificant @5% label.
I'm not able to understand if there is a relationship between gender and age with signal violation behaviour, then why the aggregate survival model estimates for gender and age are insignificant?
Any suggestion on these results will be appreciated.
Related Posts with Need help on clarification why chi-square test shows significant relationship but Survival analysis shows no significant influence.
Power calculation for sensitivity of a diagnostic testHi, I want to test the sensitivity of a rapid test & need to calculate the desired sample size.…
Using xtreg, error "Panels are not nested in clusters"Dear users, I would like to find out how shocks affect household consumption. I have a balanced pane…
Margins postHi all, I have the following problem: using the margins plot command to look at the graph between my…
Lagged response modelDear Statalisters, I am using a longitudinall dataset in which my main outcome is "QI score" (measu…
npregress series: How can I fit an additively seperable model with more than one variable per additive function?Hey, Im trying to fit a semiparametric model with npregress series. The model I want to fit should …
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Need help on clarification why chi-square test shows significant relationship but Survival analysis shows no significant influence.
Post a Comment