I'm trying to understand the impact of waiting time at intersection on pedestrian signal violation behaviour. I have two variables, one is gender and other is age. I used a chi-square test of independence and observed gender and age, both are significantly associated with crossing behaviour (waited/violated). But when I fit a survival analysis model both with COX and Accelerated Failure Time, the gender and age both comes out to be insignificant @5% label.
I'm not able to understand if there is a relationship between gender and age with signal violation behaviour, then why the aggregate survival model estimates for gender and age are insignificant?
Any suggestion on these results will be appreciated.
Related Posts with Need help on clarification why chi-square test shows significant relationship but Survival analysis shows no significant influence.
Panel data, DiD with count dataGood day! A treatment was implemented in two steps, represented by dummies euxeupsd2 and euxeupsd2x…
Create new variables using the medianDear all. Please, How can I create new two variables (Z and Y) using the median of variable (X) ? . …
Cox Regression - observations end on or before enter()Dear StataList Members, I am trying to conduct a surival anaylsis using the data I placed here. Th…
Drop panel if firm age 0 is missingHi Stata, I want to delete the panel if it not contain firm_age = 0. Any ideas? year firmid fi…
One tailed test of independent variablesHello everyone, I have to determine p-values bases on one-tailed tests for each of my independent v…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Need help on clarification why chi-square test shows significant relationship but Survival analysis shows no significant influence.
Post a Comment