I'm trying to understand the impact of waiting time at intersection on pedestrian signal violation behaviour. I have two variables, one is gender and other is age. I used a chi-square test of independence and observed gender and age, both are significantly associated with crossing behaviour (waited/violated). But when I fit a survival analysis model both with COX and Accelerated Failure Time, the gender and age both comes out to be insignificant @5% label.
I'm not able to understand if there is a relationship between gender and age with signal violation behaviour, then why the aggregate survival model estimates for gender and age are insignificant?
Any suggestion on these results will be appreciated.
Related Posts with Need help on clarification why chi-square test shows significant relationship but Survival analysis shows no significant influence.
event study approach: coefficients different between 2 groupsHi there, I am working with an event study approach to see if the effect of becoming a parent on ea…
Converting String Variables QuestionsHello everyone, I am hoping that you all may be able to help with a question that I have been unsucc…
Fixed effects vs random effect (NBM) and stata commandI am investigating the effect of Human Development Index (country level Independant variable) on Neg…
gen with differences between observationsDear all, I have the following dataset. I am trying to create a variable that generates 1 when the …
Gregory Hansen mixed resultsHi All, I need some advice. I have performed the Gregory Hansen test for cointegration to check fo…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Need help on clarification why chi-square test shows significant relationship but Survival analysis shows no significant influence.
Post a Comment