Hello everyone. I have an unbalanced panel for 105 countries with 15 years time period. have run the following regression using xtdpdsys: xtdpdsys d.depvar d.indepvar1 d.indepvar2 popusharworld finp, lags(1) pre(wtodum) endog(reer tot mehi) artests(2). Though I got desirable results as per my theoretical proposition, the number of instruments (458) far exceeds number of groups (62).
I have then run the same regression in xtabond2 as follows: xtabond2 d.depvar ld.depvar d.indepvar1 d.indepvar2 d.reer popusharworld finp mehi, gmm(ld.depvar d.reer mehi, collapse) iv(wtodum) robust artest(2). I got number of instruments much less than number of groups now but my results have changed or rather worsened drastically.
Please help me with the commands and suggest how can I retain my good results.
Related Posts with issue of number of instruments in xtdpdsys
Dealing with census year in multilevel modelHi, I have a hard time figuring this out. I have population data gathered from 7 consecutive censuse…
Help creating log metric for pooled odds ratioDear all, I am trying to perform egger test on my meta analysis of studies on the prevalence of dis…
Dummy variables in pseudo-panel modelsDear all, When I incorporate dummies in pseudo-panel models, should I use the dummy variable itself…
Xtpoisson returning incorrect incidence rate ratiosHi stata masters here, I am working on an analysis but getting quite frustrated with xtpoisson. I am…
A question in "encode"Hello, I have a question about "encode". Why the "encode" don't present "English dummy" by defined. …
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to issue of number of instruments in xtdpdsys
Post a Comment