As i understand it, the rho indicates the percentage of the variance that is due to individual fixed effects (u_i). Is that correctly understood? In that case, is it correctly understood that the R^2 reported does not include the proportion of the variance that is due to individual fixed effects, only the proportion that is due to the variables that are "explicity" (i don't know how else to express it) a part of the model?
Related Posts with Interpreting Stata's R^2 and rho in a fixed effects regression
Regressions Table in StataHow to create a table in Stata which shows the difference of two regression results previously run? …
Predicting counterfactual from reghdfeDear Statlisters, I am trying to compute a counterfactual prediction if a certain explanatory varia…
Convert variables to numericHello, I have the following dataset (below) and I want to convert the variables "tfertrate", "mofert…
OLS with binary dependent variableHi everyone, I read several papers where they employ an OLS method (xtreg with fixed effects) for p…
Export labels from alpha output to ExcelI am estimating the alpha of several variables. I have specified asis, item, and label. I need to be…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Interpreting Stata's R^2 and rho in a fixed effects regression
Post a Comment