As i understand it, the rho indicates the percentage of the variance that is due to individual fixed effects (u_i). Is that correctly understood? In that case, is it correctly understood that the R^2 reported does not include the proportion of the variance that is due to individual fixed effects, only the proportion that is due to the variables that are "explicity" (i don't know how else to express it) a part of the model?
Related Posts with Interpreting Stata's R^2 and rho in a fixed effects regression
Error specifying multiple quantilesI am trying to run quantile regression with clustered standard errors. I would like to run .25, .5 .…
How I can egen a variable to capture the sum value of numbers in the different columnsDear Stata users, I am working on a dataset with many dummy variables. What I want to achieve is eg…
Identifying sequences in string variables across observationsHello. I have string data in the format described below. I want to generate a new variable "Pregnanc…
vce(cluster var1 var2) varlist not allowed r(101)Hi!, I am trying to run fixed effect with two-way clustering. For instance: reghdfe capx x1 x2, abs…
Can PPML be used beyond gravity models?Dear All, I am helping a friend with some Stata coding. I am myself not an expert. They have a cou…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Interpreting Stata's R^2 and rho in a fixed effects regression
Post a Comment