As i understand it, the rho indicates the percentage of the variance that is due to individual fixed effects (u_i). Is that correctly understood? In that case, is it correctly understood that the R^2 reported does not include the proportion of the variance that is due to individual fixed effects, only the proportion that is due to the variables that are "explicity" (i don't know how else to express it) a part of the model?
Related Posts with Interpreting Stata's R^2 and rho in a fixed effects regression
Setting significant levels and explanationHi everyone, I am new to the forum. My original paper shows that " *, ** and *** denote significanc…
Margins and Predict for Tobit estimationI have a question regarding the following error message: missing predicted values encountered within…
Performing a Backward Hierarchical Stepwise Selection on Multiple Imputed DataHi can someone help me figure out how to perform this in Stata 15? I looked for possible solutions a…
grqreg xlabel and ylabelHello there, I am facing a problem when using the xlabel and ylabel in grqreg in STATA Quantile Reg…
Observations for the same ID on multiple lines Code: * Example generated by -dataex-. To install: ssc install dataex clear input str33 country flo…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Interpreting Stata's R^2 and rho in a fixed effects regression
Post a Comment