As i understand it, the rho indicates the percentage of the variance that is due to individual fixed effects (u_i). Is that correctly understood? In that case, is it correctly understood that the R^2 reported does not include the proportion of the variance that is due to individual fixed effects, only the proportion that is due to the variables that are "explicity" (i don't know how else to express it) a part of the model?
Related Posts with Interpreting Stata's R^2 and rho in a fixed effects regression
ml maximize, technique(bhhh): option technique() not allowed- Calculating the Employment-Weighted Mean Differential
- Difference between using l1.var and previously generated lagged variable
- How to save my y and residual errors from a regression loop
- Different output from estimates table when using stored estimates
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Interpreting Stata's R^2 and rho in a fixed effects regression
Post a Comment