As i understand it, the rho indicates the percentage of the variance that is due to individual fixed effects (u_i). Is that correctly understood? In that case, is it correctly understood that the R^2 reported does not include the proportion of the variance that is due to individual fixed effects, only the proportion that is due to the variables that are "explicity" (i don't know how else to express it) a part of the model?
Related Posts with Interpreting Stata's R^2 and rho in a fixed effects regression
General question about Cox regressionI have a group of patients that have stopped taking treatment at one health facility (say Facility A…
Listing the var name in a specified field rather than the value - Syntax help?Hello fellow Stata Users! I am a new user and am in need of some help. I have several race variable…
Working with Dates in Panel DataI'm trying to compute and incidence case based on test_1. So an incident case will be a positive tes…
XTREGs and XTSUR differencesHi, I am wondering why equation by equation XTREG with random effects (same vars in each equation) …
Identifying observations with consecutive 3 quarters.Dear All, Suppose the data set is: Code: * Example generated by -dataex-. For more info, type help …
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Interpreting Stata's R^2 and rho in a fixed effects regression
Post a Comment