Hello, I am running a robustness check using 2SLS and was having trouble interpreting the Cragg-Donald Wald F statistic and Stock-Yogo weak ID test critical values together. In summary:
1. The Cragg-Donald Wald F statistic is > 10 - however,
2. One of the Stock-Yogo weak ID test critical values is greater than the Cragg-Donald Wald F statistic

I am not sure how I should interpret this result i.e. are the IVs that I selected weak or adequate? I am pasting my code below. Any clarifications would be greatly appreciated. Thank you.

Code:
. xtivreg2 Ln_EBIT_ROA Ln_Revenue Ln_LTD_to_Sales Ln_Intangible_Assets CoAge wGDPpc wCPI wDCF wExp
> gr wGDPgr wCons No_of_Regions Ln_PS_RD (l1.Ln_GSD =  Ln_Int_exp  Ln_FSTS_by_Indgrp_Yr) if CoAge>
> =0 & NATION=="UNITED STATES" & NATIONCODE==840 & FSTS>=10 & FSTS <=100 & GENERALINDUSTRYCLASSIFI
> CATION ==1 & Year_<2020 & Year_<YearInactive & Discr_GS_Rev!=1, fe endog (l1.Ln_GSD)
Warning - singleton groups detected.  36 observation(s) not used.

FIXED EFFECTS ESTIMATION
------------------------
Number of groups =       148                    Obs per group: min =         2
                                                               avg =       5.8
                                                               max =        17

IV (2SLS) estimation
--------------------

Estimates efficient for homoskedasticity only
Statistics consistent for homoskedasticity only

                                                      Number of obs =      861
                                                      F( 13,   700) =     4.91
                                                      Prob > F      =   0.0000
Total (centered) SS     =  240.0292164                Centered R2   =  -0.0099
Total (uncentered) SS   =  240.0292164                Uncentered R2 =  -0.0099
Residual SS             =  242.4170823                Root MSE      =    .5831

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Ln_EBIT_ROA |      Coef.   Std. Err.      z    P>|z|     [95% Conf. Interval]
---------------------+----------------------------------------------------------------
              Ln_GSD |
                 L1. |  -1.080281   .4164248    -2.59   0.009    -1.896459   -.2641034
                     |
          Ln_Revenue |   .5031523    .136515     3.69   0.000     .2355878    .7707168
     Ln_LTD_to_Sales |  -.1659439    .034025    -4.88   0.000    -.2326317   -.0992562
Ln_Intangible_Assets |     -.0631   .0425919    -1.48   0.138    -.1465785    .0203786
               CoAge |  -.0303457   .0139135    -2.18   0.029    -.0576157   -.0030758
              wGDPpc |   .0000707   .0000312     2.27   0.023     9.60e-06    .0001318
                wCPI |  -.0052788   .0276587    -0.19   0.849    -.0594889    .0489313
                wDCF |   2.93e-14   1.54e-13     0.19   0.849    -2.72e-13    3.31e-13
              wExpgr |    .009156   .0113405     0.81   0.419     -.013071     .031383
              wGDPgr |  -.0151599   .0337094    -0.45   0.653    -.0812292    .0509094
               wCons |   2.55e-14   5.83e-14     0.44   0.662    -8.88e-14    1.40e-13
       No_of_Regions |   .0875564   .0813537     1.08   0.282    -.0718939    .2470068
            Ln_PS_RD |   -.054201   .0683068    -0.79   0.427    -.1880798    .0796779
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Underidentification test (Anderson canon. corr. LM statistic):          34.438
                                                   Chi-sq(2) P-val =    0.0000
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weak identification test (Cragg-Donald Wald F statistic):               17.738
Stock-Yogo weak ID test critical values: 10% maximal IV size             19.93
                                         15% maximal IV size             11.59
                                         20% maximal IV size              8.75
                                         25% maximal IV size              7.25
Source: Stock-Yogo (2005).  Reproduced by permission.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sargan statistic (overidentification test of all instruments):           0.765
                                                   Chi-sq(1) P-val =    0.3818
-endog- option:
Endogeneity test of endogenous regressors:                               4.278
                                                   Chi-sq(1) P-val =    0.0386
Regressors tested:    L.Ln_GSD
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Instrumented:         L.Ln_GSD
Included instruments: Ln_Revenue Ln_LTD_to_Sales Ln_Intangible_Assets CoAge
                      wGDPpc wCPI wDCF wExpgr wGDPgr wCons No_of_Regions
                      Ln_PS_RD
Excluded instruments: Ln_Int_exp Ln_FSTS_by_Indgrp_Yr
------------------------------------------------------------------------------