Dear community,
My sincere apologies in advance for not having data or code yet to show. This is a very general question.
When an RCT comparing intervention to control fails to show a significant difference, there remains a question of whether there might be a subgroup of "likely responders" where the comparison of intervention vs. control is statistically significant.
A group has used a similar approach using machine learning in R (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7540534/)
I wanted to know if Stata had the same capabilities, ML programs/commands, or if anyone could point out resources to be able to identify subgroups of "likely responders"
Thank you very much
Related Posts with Identifying responders vs. non-responders in randomized controlled trials using Machine Learning, possible in Stata?
How to deal with ratios as dependent and independent variables in a panel data regressionHello everyone, I am trying to run a panel data regression for my thesis aimed at testing the relat…
Trouble with countingThis is what my dataset looks like: Code: input float(firmid year firm_prod) long productid double …
PPML reset testHello to all of you. I have been working in a gravity model with 133 countries from 2005 to 2018 (O…
Statistical formula for calculating 95% CIs from two geometric meansHello, I have the following data: Group 1: Mean = 8985, confidence intervals = 5705–14150 67 peopl…
Significant AR(2) in System-GMM where the model does not include the lagged DVHi all, I am working on a system-GMM and the model does not include the lagged dependent variable. …
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Identifying responders vs. non-responders in randomized controlled trials using Machine Learning, possible in Stata?
Post a Comment