Dear community,

My sincere apologies in advance for not having data or code yet to show. This is a very general question.

When an RCT comparing intervention to control fails to show a significant difference, there remains a question of whether there might be a subgroup of "likely responders" where the comparison of intervention vs. control is statistically significant.

A group has used a similar approach using machine learning in R (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7540534/)

I wanted to know if Stata had the same capabilities, ML programs/commands, or if anyone could point out resources to be able to identify subgroups of "likely responders"

Thank you very much