Dear community,
I am deciding among Pooled OLS, Fixed and Random Effects panel models in the presence of first-order autocorrelation ( null hypothesis of Wooldridge test for autocorrelation in panel data is not rejected) . Thus, i have found out that the command . xtregar gives reliable estimates in the presence of AR1. So I run the FE and RE tests ( e.g., . xtregar, re) and then the default Hausman test . hausman fixed random. The null hypothesis is rejected, meaning FE is to be chosen.
1) Am i doing everything correctly till now?
An now i want also to exclude Pooled OLS by running the Breusch and Pagan Lagrangian multiplier test for random effects. Usually it is done with the comand of . xttest0 but it returns an error message last estimates not found r(301)
2) Which command/ procedure would be appropriate in order to exclude Pooled OLS?
I want to mention that there is no heteroscedasticity problem, only the autocorrelation is the issue.
Thank you a lot for support!
Kind Regards
Farid
Related Posts with Breusch and Pagan LM test for random effects
GLM vs. GEE for crossed random effectsI'm doing education research and looking at the effect of a particular study tool. My treatment was …
Firth's method for Cox RegressionHi all, Can anyone guide me how to carry out a Firth Penalized Cox Regression with STATA? One of m…
Analyze a wrong code for drop all missing valuesif I want to drop any observation which contains at least one missing value for a variable. The code…
Creating an inflation index seriesHello, From the data below, you can see that i have the inflation for a few years. However, this ca…
Inquire about "quietly histogram" Code: set rng kiss32 quietly set obs 30 set seed 10101 gen x=runiform() sum x quietly histogram x,…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Breusch and Pagan LM test for random effects
Post a Comment