Dear community,
I am deciding among Pooled OLS, Fixed and Random Effects panel models in the presence of first-order autocorrelation ( null hypothesis of Wooldridge test for autocorrelation in panel data is not rejected) . Thus, i have found out that the command . xtregar gives reliable estimates in the presence of AR1. So I run the FE and RE tests ( e.g., . xtregar, re) and then the default Hausman test . hausman fixed random. The null hypothesis is rejected, meaning FE is to be chosen.
1) Am i doing everything correctly till now?
An now i want also to exclude Pooled OLS by running the Breusch and Pagan Lagrangian multiplier test for random effects. Usually it is done with the comand of . xttest0 but it returns an error message last estimates not found r(301)
2) Which command/ procedure would be appropriate in order to exclude Pooled OLS?
I want to mention that there is no heteroscedasticity problem, only the autocorrelation is the issue.
Thank you a lot for support!
Kind Regards
Farid
Related Posts with Breusch and Pagan LM test for random effects
Stata do-editor settingsDear All, is there any way to preserve the option to show whitespace in the Stata's do-editor? (the…
Creating a new variable which are label values of other variableDear Statalist , I have a data of food item that people eat. The data stored as numeric and labelle…
candisc command and estat anova? Hello everyone, I have run the “candisc” command and need advice about how to get the R-squared, F …
Working with data frame: executing commands on all framesHi, I am pretty new in using data frames. I intend to execute commands on all frames after creating…
2SLS and Heckman SelectionIs there an existing package on Stata to estimate a model to account for both endogeneity (2SLS) and…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Breusch and Pagan LM test for random effects
Post a Comment