Dear community,
I am deciding among Pooled OLS, Fixed and Random Effects panel models in the presence of first-order autocorrelation ( null hypothesis of Wooldridge test for autocorrelation in panel data is not rejected) . Thus, i have found out that the command . xtregar gives reliable estimates in the presence of AR1. So I run the FE and RE tests ( e.g., . xtregar, re) and then the default Hausman test . hausman fixed random. The null hypothesis is rejected, meaning FE is to be chosen.
1) Am i doing everything correctly till now?
An now i want also to exclude Pooled OLS by running the Breusch and Pagan Lagrangian multiplier test for random effects. Usually it is done with the comand of . xttest0 but it returns an error message last estimates not found r(301)
2) Which command/ procedure would be appropriate in order to exclude Pooled OLS?
I want to mention that there is no heteroscedasticity problem, only the autocorrelation is the issue.
Thank you a lot for support!
Kind Regards
Farid
Related Posts with Breusch and Pagan LM test for random effects
ds vs display loopHello, Can anyone help me identify why: Code: foreach var of varlist `contvarlist' { …
nwcommands question: nwhierarchyI'm using nwhierarchy as part of Thomas Grund's nwcommands package. I am using something like this c…
Question on analyzing multiple answers questionI have a data set of 987 respondents. I asked them on there most common sources of treatment and the…
How to add "tailor made" error bars to a line graph.Dear beloved all, Recently I am working on how to draw a line graph like this: Array However, my …
Plotting Y1 and Y2 variable on a Time Series Line Plot Code: * Example generated by -dataex-. To install: ssc install dataex clear input double(prod op) …
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Breusch and Pagan LM test for random effects
Post a Comment