I am computing a multinomial logit on two outcomes (Marriage, Dissolution vs a reference outcome Censored).
I perform an interaction between eddyad and save23. As you can see, from the equation of Marriage, the interaction for a specific level of education and save23 results signficant.
This result would be in line with my hypothesis. However, if I do the Wald test for the all interaction (see below),
the whole interaction results not signficant.
I am uncertain on whether it is the case of commenting on the signficant interaction in the equation of Marriage.
If you could give me your advice, it would be heplful.
Thank you.Best regards, Lydia
Multnomial output
Code:
. svy: mlogit uniontype2 i.durationtype i.eddyad##i.save23 i.wave5 ib0.evunionpr if marital==3&duratyrs3>
> 0&duratyrs3<6&sampst==1&ivfioall==1&homo3==0&(minagentry>18&minagentry<37)&sex!=.&educ2_f!=4&educ2_m!=4&ag
> esm2_f!=.&agesm2_m!=. , rrr level(95)
(running mlogit on estimation sample)
Survey: Multinomial logistic regression
Number of strata = 1 Number of obs = 3,430
Linearized
uniontype2 RRR Std. Err. t P>t [95% Conf. Interval]
Dissolution
durationtype
3rd-4th-5th .5506879 .1072258 -3.06 0.002 .3757766 .8070146
eddyad
One HE .7122864 .1922541 -1.26 0.209 .4193515 1.209849
Both HE 1.012125 .3568225 0.03 0.973 .5066604 2.021861
1.save23 1.412005 .3301809 1.48 0.140 .8922956 2.234414
eddyad#save23
One HE#1 1.166484 .4611182 0.39 0.697 .5369254 2.534217
Both HE#1 .9583136 .5243717 -0.08 0.938 .3274022 2.805006
wave5
1998-2008 1.552379 .3395749 2.01 0.045 1.0105 2.38484
2009-2019 1.623017 .4363169 1.80 0.072 .9575636 2.750924
evunionpr
Re-p man 1.274238 .3198818 0.97 0.335 .7785061 2.085638
Re-par 2.150853 .5067261 3.25 0.001 1.354527 3.415339
Missing 8.367679 2.235536 7.95 0.000 4.953031 14.13641
_cons .0621653 .0142148 -12.15 0.000 .0396856 .0973785
Marriage
durationtype
3rd-4th-5th 1.406513 .1967009 2.44 0.015 1.068891 1.850777
eddyad
One HE 1.217075 .2510323 0.95 0.341 .811894 1.824464
Both HE 1.627588 .3438196 2.31 0.021 1.075168 2.463842
1.save23 .7895424 .1937916 -0.96 0.336 .4876989 1.278201
eddyad#save23
One HE#1 .5595597 .221171 -1.47 0.142 .2575857 1.215546
Both HE#1 .3399812 .160764 -2.28 0.023 .1343942 .8600612
wave5
1998-2008 .5290171 .0940735 -3.58 0.000 .3731534 .7499842
2009-2019 .3611195 .0722338 -5.09 0.000 .2438621 .5347582
evunionpr
Re-partn 1.274623 .2505097 1.23 0.217 .8666648 1.874616
Re-partne 1.412494 .3152844 1.55 0.122 .9114191 2.189048
Missing .5560639 .2399269 -1.36 0.174 .238413 1.296939
_cons .2672354 .0470906 -7.49 0.000 .1890979 .3776603
Wald test
Code:
( 1) [Censored]1o.eddyad#1o.save23 = 0 ( 2) [Dissolution]1.eddyad#1.save23 = 0 ( 3) [Marriage]1.eddyad#1.save23 = 0 ( 4) [Censored]2o.eddyad#1o.save23 = 0 ( 5) [Dissolution]2.eddyad#1.save23 = 0 ( 6) [Marriage]2.eddyad#1.save23 = 0 Constraint 1 dropped Constraint 4 dropped F( 4, 847) = 1.53 Prob > F = 0.1911
0 Response to Wald test: the whole interaction not significant but one level is signficant
Post a Comment