Is it correct to take logs of a variable, e.g. tax revenue, already measured in percentage form?
e.g.
(1) ln(GDP) = c + B1ln(physical capital) + B2ln(human capital) + B3TaxRevenue
vs
(2) ln(GDP) = c + B1ln(physical capital) + B2ln(human capital) + B3ln(TaxRevenue)
How would the interpretation change between (1) and (2) - I seem to be getting better and more appropriate results when I use (2) - but wondering if it is permissible to take logs of a variable already in percentage format (e.g. 25.8)
Paul
**It may help by saying that I am looking to interpret my answer as a percentage point increase in e.g. tax revenue...**
Related Posts with Correct to take log of explanatory variable already in percentages?
How to interpret "marginals" in case of the zero-weighted binomial model?How to interpret "marginals" in case of the zero-weighted binomial model? It may be noted that in t…
t-valuesDear all, After running a regression in Stata, I export the result to an excel file by using the out…
spmap to plot dataHi Everyone, I am using the 2015-16 wave of the Demographic and health survey from India, it contai…
SVY and MELOGITDear Statalisters, I am analysing longitudinal data in long format from a complex survey design. Th…
Comparing coefficients between nested and non-nested fixed effects regression modelsI am using panel data, and would like to evaluate whether coefficients from different fixed effects …
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Correct to take log of explanatory variable already in percentages?
Post a Comment