Is it correct to take logs of a variable, e.g. tax revenue, already measured in percentage form?
e.g.
(1) ln(GDP) = c + B1ln(physical capital) + B2ln(human capital) + B3TaxRevenue
vs
(2) ln(GDP) = c + B1ln(physical capital) + B2ln(human capital) + B3ln(TaxRevenue)
How would the interpretation change between (1) and (2) - I seem to be getting better and more appropriate results when I use (2) - but wondering if it is permissible to take logs of a variable already in percentage format (e.g. 25.8)
Paul
**It may help by saying that I am looking to interpret my answer as a percentage point increase in e.g. tax revenue...**
Related Posts with Correct to take log of explanatory variable already in percentages?
Variable labelling using loopHi, I am dealing with commodity-level price data. I have price data of around 800 commodities. Commo…
Identify values that occur only onceHi, Hopefully a simple question for you. I have a large data set on transactions, and I need to ide…
Marginsplot: two groups with 10 study years - no intersection of CI and very narrow 95% CIsHi all, Since I am not very familiar with the margin analysis, so it will be really appreciated if …
match email across multiple datasetsHi, I have three datasets with master data (userid, names, email addresses, salary etc) data1 (emai…
Fleiss kappa coefficient and Kendall coefficientGood morning. How could you calculate Fleiss's Kappa coefficient and Kendall's correlation coefficie…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Correct to take log of explanatory variable already in percentages?
Post a Comment