Is it correct to take logs of a variable, e.g. tax revenue, already measured in percentage form?
e.g.
(1) ln(GDP) = c + B1ln(physical capital) + B2ln(human capital) + B3TaxRevenue
vs
(2) ln(GDP) = c + B1ln(physical capital) + B2ln(human capital) + B3ln(TaxRevenue)
How would the interpretation change between (1) and (2) - I seem to be getting better and more appropriate results when I use (2) - but wondering if it is permissible to take logs of a variable already in percentage format (e.g. 25.8)
Paul
**It may help by saying that I am looking to interpret my answer as a percentage point increase in e.g. tax revenue...**
Related Posts with Correct to take log of explanatory variable already in percentages?
Recoding into another variableI am at a loss here and would be grateful for any help: I have a string variable "Other-specify." S…
odbc load throwing error for long SQL queryI am trying to download data from a read-only database using odbc load, exec(). My SQL query is gene…
Define value label tand conver it to from a string variable to a numeric oneHello, My name is Christian and I am just beginning as a user of STATA. My question might be a bit …
dataset structure for cluster samplingi want to select 800 clusters from a listing of 2000 enumeration areas. my sampling strategy is syst…
Post hoc analyses after multi-nominal regressionHello, I have a dataset with a categorical outcome variable (strategy) that includes four groups. I…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Correct to take log of explanatory variable already in percentages?
Post a Comment