I ran a regression with reghdfe on multiple imputation datasets, The data includes 500 organizations over 23 years, with 20 imputations.
I first estimated the regression using the vce(robust) then I re-ran the model using the option vce(cluster clustvar). In many cases, the standard errors were much smaller when I used the vce(cluster clustvar) option.
Does this seem reasonable? What can explain the difference between the cluster and the robust? Can this be caused because of the reghdfe absorb specification or the MI?
Code:
mi estimate, post cmdok:reghdfe f.women var1 var2 var3, absorb(id year) vce(robust)
mi estimate, post cmdok:reghdfe f.women var1 var2 var3, absorb(id year) vce(cluster id)
Thanks in advance!
Gayle
Related Posts with reghdfe - difference between robust and cluster error
Dominance Analysis Command for Multilevel Zero-Inflated Negative Binomial RegressionDear everyone, Could anyone assist with the Stata command for performing a dominance analysis on a …
panel data - averages in new groupHi I have a large data set with 9 different balance sheet variables for 57 Companies, over ca. 16 y…
Storing cell proportions of survey dataHello, I am trying to store cell proportions using: Code: svy: tab gender2 symptoms, row matcell(c…
Grouping string values together to create a new variableHi there, I'm very new to Stata and I'm doing some research on regional inequalities in Europe. My …
Help with mlogitHi everyone, I am exploiting a multinomial logit model to study the probability of workers of belong…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to reghdfe - difference between robust and cluster error
Post a Comment