I ran a regression with reghdfe on multiple imputation datasets, The data includes 500 organizations over 23 years, with 20 imputations.
I first estimated the regression using the vce(robust) then I re-ran the model using the option vce(cluster clustvar). In many cases, the standard errors were much smaller when I used the vce(cluster clustvar) option.
Does this seem reasonable? What can explain the difference between the cluster and the robust? Can this be caused because of the reghdfe absorb specification or the MI?
Code:
mi estimate, post cmdok:reghdfe f.women var1 var2 var3, absorb(id year) vce(robust)
mi estimate, post cmdok:reghdfe f.women var1 var2 var3, absorb(id year) vce(cluster id)
Thanks in advance!
Gayle
Related Posts with reghdfe - difference between robust and cluster error
Why can't we cluster on anything we like?I often get error messages indicating that Stata doesn't like the variable that I have chosen to clu…
local variable definition based of last character of string variable being odd or evenHi, I am trying to define a local variable based on the last character of global variable (M_crisis…
Logistic regression, propensity score matching, or IPTW?Hello, I would like to compare the "adjusted" mortality after surgery between two cohorts with very…
Writing a LoopDear Statalist Users, I have multiple txt files and I want to convert them into stata files so that…
Automated means to export elasticity outputs after estimating Almost Ideal Demand System (AIDS) using the Stata command 'aidsills'?Dear Statalisters, I have been running AIDS demand systems for several population subgroups using th…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to reghdfe - difference between robust and cluster error
Post a Comment