I ran a regression with reghdfe on multiple imputation datasets, The data includes 500 organizations over 23 years, with 20 imputations.
I first estimated the regression using the vce(robust) then I re-ran the model using the option vce(cluster clustvar). In many cases, the standard errors were much smaller when I used the vce(cluster clustvar) option.
Does this seem reasonable? What can explain the difference between the cluster and the robust? Can this be caused because of the reghdfe absorb specification or the MI?
Code:
mi estimate, post cmdok:reghdfe f.women var1 var2 var3, absorb(id year) vce(robust)
mi estimate, post cmdok:reghdfe f.women var1 var2 var3, absorb(id year) vce(cluster id)
Thanks in advance!
Gayle
Related Posts with reghdfe - difference between robust and cluster error
Flow ControlHi all! I'm trying to create a situation where I can check a set of country/state names (education_…
Event Studies, Difference-in-Differences, and Synthetic ControlsI don't have a Stata question as much as I do a conceptual statistics question. I'm writing an event…
Controlling for both level and difference in variables between partnersUsing panel data, I'd like to measure the effect of life satisfaction in couples on generated wealth…
Shift values across columns (variables) to clean semi-regular parsing errorI'm using Stata 17 MP on a hosted application (Windows environment), though I'm running test code on…
Reshaping Data, Wide format from long Hello everyone, I'm having trouble formatting my data. I have a dataset that looks like this: Cou…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to reghdfe - difference between robust and cluster error
Post a Comment