I have individual-level panel wealth-at-age data with 4600 observations on 350 individuals. Because wealth tends to be skewed, I am as interested in the conditional median as the mean. When I estimate a quantile fixed effects model using xtqreg, it returns the message
WARNING: some fitted values of the scale function are negative
and I get the odd result that the predicted median is greater than the predicted mean, even though there are many more zero values ( I use the inverse hyperbolic sine of wealth as the transform) than high values. And when I plot the predicted wealth-at-age values over the scatterplot, the median values are all close to the maximum values where the predicted means at age seem plausible. I assume the odd result is consistent with Canay's (2011) contention that the fixed effect quantile estimator is not consistent with small T.
Related Posts with Negative scale value using fixed effects quantile regression xtqreg
Dropping observations within a variable if they are not numericHow do I drop observations within a variable if they are not numeric? …
Horizontal Bar graph order and widthHi there, First of all I am trying to change the widths of the bars in this command (see picture): …
Mean correcting a panel data setSimple coding question. How do I mean correct a set of panel data. The example here is a set of valu…
Store tab command's resultsHi all! How can I store in some locals the percentages shown by tab command? Thank you in advance.…
Which econometric model I can use if my choice variables are not mutally exclusive?Hello, We know discrete choice models describe decision-makers’ choices among alternatives and one i…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Negative scale value using fixed effects quantile regression xtqreg
Post a Comment