Hello all,
I am currently writing my thesis and testing some hypotheses. With one of my hypotheses, I want to test whether employee satisfaction (M) has a moderating effect on firm performance (Y) in heterogeneous M&A transactions (X). The variables are all metric scaled.
In a previously conducted simple as well as multiple regression analysis in which I examine the effect of heterogeneity in the context of M&A transactions (X) on firm performance (Y), there is a positive effect of X on Y, but it is not significant.
However, when I include employee satisfaction as a moderator in my analysis, according to the analysis, there is a significant effect of X on Y & a slightly significant interaction effect + confidence interval is between - 0.011 and 0.145.
How can I interpret that the previously non-significant effect of X on Y (simple linear /multiple regression) is significant when moderated.
Or statistically due to the non-significant effect I may not even examine moderation in my regression analysis?
Thanks a lot for your help!
Related Posts with Moderation analysis
ivreg2 warning covariance matrix of moment conditions not of full rankDear Stata Users, I was trying to estimate an IV regression (2SLS) I have few dummies in my model, …
DID estimationhello everyone, how can I treat the problem if I see an error years not nested in countryid or count…
Double Clustering in a Multi-country Data Set upDear Stata Members First, a heartfelt advance New Year Wishes to All. I wish all a prosperous New Ye…
Interpretation of constant in xtregHello everyone! I am currently writing my master thesis, where I analyze the effect of hurricanes o…
Xtabond2 command system GMM.Hello to everyone, I am searching in terms of the effect of the uncertainty on the saving and in one…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Moderation analysis
Post a Comment