Hello,
I am currently working with the Arellano Bond difference estimator and I'm not able to generate the same results for the commands xtabond and xtabond2.
I tried to replicate the results from the following xtabond command with the xtabond2 command (x1 and x2 are exogenous):
xtabond y x1 x2 i.year, twostep vce(robust)
xtabond2 y l.y x1 x2 i.year, gmm(l.y) iv(x1 x2 i.year) noleveleq twostep robust small
Why do the two options not generate the same results?
Also, I am wondering how variables are treated if they are listed before the comma, but not after the comma. For example, how is x2 being estimated in the following case?
xtabond2 y l.y x1 x2, gmm(l.y) iv(x1) noleveleq twostep robust
I also asked another question yesterday about the interaction of an endogenous and exogenous variable. Any responses would be really appreciated!
Thank you so much in advance.
Sofie
Related Posts with xtabond vs. xtabond2: How to get the same results?
convert hexadecimal to binaryI have variables whose values come as hexadecimal strings 32 characters long as a rusult of an md5 h…
Combinations of binary variablesHello, I have a dataset with 10 variables and 5 binary variables (A, B, C,D,E). I'm trying to get a…
Robustness checksDear statalist, I am running a bootstrap on an OLS model with the dependent variable being log(maxi…
HGLM - Model 2 level variables not siginificant but postestimation plot shows variationGood day, I am using a two level HGLM model model 1 - Level 1 variables have significant effect on …
Comparing coefficients while keeping difference between other coefficients constant in mixed modelDear Statalist users, I would like to compare whether the slope is statistically different between …
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to xtabond vs. xtabond2: How to get the same results?
Post a Comment