Hello,
I am currently working with the Arellano Bond difference estimator and I'm not able to generate the same results for the commands xtabond and xtabond2.
I tried to replicate the results from the following xtabond command with the xtabond2 command (x1 and x2 are exogenous):
xtabond y x1 x2 i.year, twostep vce(robust)
xtabond2 y l.y x1 x2 i.year, gmm(l.y) iv(x1 x2 i.year) noleveleq twostep robust small
Why do the two options not generate the same results?
Also, I am wondering how variables are treated if they are listed before the comma, but not after the comma. For example, how is x2 being estimated in the following case?
xtabond2 y l.y x1 x2, gmm(l.y) iv(x1) noleveleq twostep robust
I also asked another question yesterday about the interaction of an endogenous and exogenous variable. Any responses would be really appreciated!
Thank you so much in advance.
Sofie
Related Posts with xtabond vs. xtabond2: How to get the same results?
How to present vignettes in a tabular formatHello everyone, Could you please help me to present vignettes in a tabular format rather than a run…
Writing loop for multiple regressionsI have 10 dependant variables, y1-y30, and its respective lagged variables, lagy1-lagy30. I would li…
using "spmap"Hi guys, I am trying to map the result by using "spmap" command, yet keep having troubles with the …
FMM lcprob variablesHello experts, In FMM (finite mixture models), our main models(s) could have certain IVs. Then, I c…
calculating and graphing marginal effects from logit with interaction effect of two categorical variables Code: * Example generated by -dataex-. To install: ssc install dataex clear input byte(owndecision…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to xtabond vs. xtabond2: How to get the same results?
Post a Comment