Hello,
I am currently working with the Arellano Bond difference estimator and I'm not able to generate the same results for the commands xtabond and xtabond2.
I tried to replicate the results from the following xtabond command with the xtabond2 command (x1 and x2 are exogenous):
xtabond y x1 x2 i.year, twostep vce(robust)
xtabond2 y l.y x1 x2 i.year, gmm(l.y) iv(x1 x2 i.year) noleveleq twostep robust small
Why do the two options not generate the same results?
Also, I am wondering how variables are treated if they are listed before the comma, but not after the comma. For example, how is x2 being estimated in the following case?
xtabond2 y l.y x1 x2, gmm(l.y) iv(x1) noleveleq twostep robust
I also asked another question yesterday about the interaction of an endogenous and exogenous variable. Any responses would be really appreciated!
Thank you so much in advance.
Sofie
Related Posts with xtabond vs. xtabond2: How to get the same results?
How to Construct Daily Food Consumption ScoreDear Statalisters, I am working with a dataset that contains information on household consumption of…
Append regression results horizontallyHi, I am a new STATA user and found this forum has been incredibly helpful for me. I can't seem to …
Trouble with metadta for diagnostic test accuracy systematic reviewHello, im relatively new to stata so please forgive me if there is something obvious im missing. Im …
IV RegressionHello everyone. May I please have some assistance on what command I should use for my IV regression?…
How to get rows into columns when non transposable?Hi all , I was wondering whether someone could help me with a command so I can convert my data into…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to xtabond vs. xtabond2: How to get the same results?
Post a Comment