Dears Statalists,
In my panel data analysis, I am using interaction term. The model looks something like Y=b0+b1*X+b2*Z+ b3*XZ+e.
Now the interaction term is strongly correlated with X or Z. In order to get around this problem, I read in Azman et al. (2010) and Burill (2007), that I can follow the following proceducer....
reg XZ X Z
then predict errors e_XZ and use these errors instead of XZ.
I did that and its great to see that e_XZ is obviously not correlated with X or Z at all. However, I was expecting e_XZ to be strongly correlated with XZ and thus would justify it usage. However, its not so strongly correlated.
Does anyone have any suggestions please? Should I use it? Is it a problem that e_XZ and XZ are not so strongly correlated and I am using it?
Thank you very much in advance
Arshad
links to the referred papers:
http://minitab.com.au/uploadedFiles/...regression.pdf
https://www.sciencedirect.com/scienc...64999310000635
Related Posts with Interaction term issue
Max Min values using rangestatDear Statalists, I would like to calculate the for each day maximum Price based on the previous 3 m…
Twoway graph with one legend in commonDear all, I would need your support for a small problem with a graph to be fixed. I have a series o…
Create variable 0/1 based on other variables - error messageHi I want to create a new variable where the new variable has the value 1 if three other variables h…
Detailed summary statistics with dummy variablesHi guys, I need to create a descriptive statistics table on a dummy variable. With the tab(...), su…
global NT = `: word count `r(varlist)''*What does it mean?: global NT = `: word count `r(varlist)'' global NT_1 = $NT - 1 …
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Interaction term issue
Post a Comment