Dears Statalists,
In my panel data analysis, I am using interaction term. The model looks something like Y=b0+b1*X+b2*Z+ b3*XZ+e.
Now the interaction term is strongly correlated with X or Z. In order to get around this problem, I read in Azman et al. (2010) and Burill (2007), that I can follow the following proceducer....
reg XZ X Z
then predict errors e_XZ and use these errors instead of XZ.
I did that and its great to see that e_XZ is obviously not correlated with X or Z at all. However, I was expecting e_XZ to be strongly correlated with XZ and thus would justify it usage. However, its not so strongly correlated.
Does anyone have any suggestions please? Should I use it? Is it a problem that e_XZ and XZ are not so strongly correlated and I am using it?
Thank you very much in advance
Arshad
links to the referred papers:
http://minitab.com.au/uploadedFiles/...regression.pdf
https://www.sciencedirect.com/scienc...64999310000635
Related Posts with Interaction term issue
"cannot open C:\Program Files (x86)\Stata13\inter.txt" , what i can do to open the matrix file?i create a distance matrix using spmat command, and when i export the following matrix to a text for…
sum of specific consecutive obsHello Everyone, I use Stata 15. The table below shows customer ID, year, and the value of transact…
rolling geometric meanHi, Is there a simple way to calculate rolling geometric means, for example 10 year window? Can I u…
Interpretation of results of catigorical#continuous interaction in comparison to reparameterized regression modelHello nice to meet you After having searched this forum and google for several days without "clear…
DecimalsHi all, I have one question about decimals. For example, variable age and casi_total in the data se…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Interaction term issue
Post a Comment