Dears Statalists,
In my panel data analysis, I am using interaction term. The model looks something like Y=b0+b1*X+b2*Z+ b3*XZ+e.
Now the interaction term is strongly correlated with X or Z. In order to get around this problem, I read in Azman et al. (2010) and Burill (2007), that I can follow the following proceducer....
reg XZ X Z
then predict errors e_XZ and use these errors instead of XZ.
I did that and its great to see that e_XZ is obviously not correlated with X or Z at all. However, I was expecting e_XZ to be strongly correlated with XZ and thus would justify it usage. However, its not so strongly correlated.
Does anyone have any suggestions please? Should I use it? Is it a problem that e_XZ and XZ are not so strongly correlated and I am using it?
Thank you very much in advance
Arshad
links to the referred papers:
http://minitab.com.au/uploadedFiles/...regression.pdf
https://www.sciencedirect.com/scienc...64999310000635
Related Posts with Interaction term issue
Statistics tableHi, I have a dataset for 12 countries, and looking to generate a table similar to the attached one. …
Plotting output from stpm2.I'm looking to plot differences in survival among patients in different treatment groups. The KM cur…
How to test whether sign of coefficient of an independent variable depends on the direction of change in the independent variable itself?I have 2 time series variables, x and y, the relationship between which I want to describe as y=a+bx…
Moran's I and spatial weights matrixHello everybody, I wish to compute the Moran's I statistic and I'm following the code written by Pi…
ginidesc questionsHi all, I am new to this forum and a very new STATA user so any help or suggestions at all is appre…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Interaction term issue
Post a Comment