Dears Statalists,
In my panel data analysis, I am using interaction term. The model looks something like Y=b0+b1*X+b2*Z+ b3*XZ+e.
Now the interaction term is strongly correlated with X or Z. In order to get around this problem, I read in Azman et al. (2010) and Burill (2007), that I can follow the following proceducer....
reg XZ X Z
then predict errors e_XZ and use these errors instead of XZ.
I did that and its great to see that e_XZ is obviously not correlated with X or Z at all. However, I was expecting e_XZ to be strongly correlated with XZ and thus would justify it usage. However, its not so strongly correlated.
Does anyone have any suggestions please? Should I use it? Is it a problem that e_XZ and XZ are not so strongly correlated and I am using it?
Thank you very much in advance
Arshad
links to the referred papers:
http://minitab.com.au/uploadedFiles/...regression.pdf
https://www.sciencedirect.com/scienc...64999310000635
Related Posts with Interaction term issue
Generalised Ordered Logit (gologit2) with Categorical Nonparallel VariableHello, I am currently studying the relationship between firm size and access to finance by using th…
coefficent of variationHello, I have run my dataset only discovered that my CV are more that 30 percent and some are even 4…
Cox regressions for Twitter data (proportional hazards)Dear all, first and foremost a happy new year to all of you! In my current research project, I am …
Lagged VariablesDear all, in a lot of econometric studies in finance they use lagged variables. Why would they do t…
matching husband-wife and father-daughter observations and generating new variablesDear Statlisters I am working on household survey data. Here I have variables on responses by house…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Interaction term issue
Post a Comment